09/24/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, t would be saving tax money and is concerned that they might have some kind of dealwhereby they could buy the property back. He did not believe that they really tried' to sell the property as a whole, pointing out that they merely had a small sign on the property to advertise it. Mrs. Hughes stated that they were not asking for a rezoning, and although she tmderstands the neighbors' concerns, the proposal does conform to code. Mr. Papandreas explained that Biskind is a realty company, as well as development company, and they marketed the property themselves. L. Orlowski moved to accept the Great Northern Association Lot Split and Assembly Plat subdividing and splitting off the rear portions of permanent parcel nos. 237-19-3 and 237-19-4 and join;ng both parcels to 237-19-2, seconded by M. Hughes. At this point Mr. Skoulis questioned if the Law Department had any problem with the the proposal. Mr. Dubelko stated he saw nothing legally wrong with the proposal. Motion was approved tmanimously. V. COMMUNICATIONS: Letter from Building Commissioner Conway regarding 2 minor changes, one to Cherandon Plaza IV, a proposed building between the original development and the corner building, where they would like to add an overhead door at the rear of the east elevation where it would not be seen from the street. The members had no problem considering this a minor change. Also the Halleen Chevrolet is proposing to install a fence on their lot which faces East Park where they had a court order allowi.ng them to use this residential lot for parking. Mr. Dubelko questioned if he had not be required to keep a house on that lot. Mr. Conway stated this was not a condition of the court order. Mr. Gorris explained that they will be installi.ng a board on board fence for 160 along the adjacent property line and then running a chain link fence north 75 feet adjacent to a natural areae Mr. Orlowski mentioned that he has seen a precast concrete fence used as a barrier with inset postse Mr. Gorris would like more information an this. Mr. Conway advised that Halleen could install a chain link fence, but chose the board on board as a buffer to the adjacent neighbore He also advised that since the court order gives them the right to pave the lot, they only need pernLission fron the Commission to install 9 lights. He reminded the members that they had approved the fence previously. According to the light projection plan, the lights would be directed away from the adjacent neighbor. After some discussion, the members agreed that the two lights closest to the residential neighbor should be removed, but the rest coUl.d be approved as a minor change. VI. COMNIITTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. NEW BUSINESS: No items. VIII. OLD BUSINESS: Discussion of the Master Plan: The members will meet at 7:00 p.m. before the next meeting with Councilman Tallon. IX. AAJOURNMIINT: T. Morgan moved to excuse the absence of Mr. Bowen and Mr. Thomas, seconded by M. Hughes, and unanimously approve. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 P.M. B. Gorris, 1 ? f B. Oring,Cler of Commissions.