Laserfiche WebLink
<br />now, and those are'`.-to be continued. The Safety Department should look at this and <br />come back with any input that they might have prior to the next meeting. The <br />Service Department should also come back with any additional input_that they <br />have. At this point Mr. Morgan questioned if the Architectural Board should not <br />look at this now even though the configuration of the homes in the Vista area <br />might change, since it might not be fair to give them just one meeting to review <br />this proposal, this way they could take a cursory look at it. Mr. Thomas <br />cautioned that they should be made aware that the Commission is asking them to <br />look at the architectural elements, not the final configuration. Mr. Gorris <br />agreed to amend his motion to forward the proposal to the Architectural Review <br />Board for a preliminary review. The motion was seconded by T. Morgan, and <br />unanimously approved. <br />Christ The King Property Rezoning Proposal. <br />The proposal is to rezone property owned by Christ The King Comrmunity, Inc. <br />(permanent parcel nos. 234-8-2,6,8, and 234-13-27 and 28), located west off <br />Barton Road and abutting the North Olmsted south corporation line, from an <br />existing zone district of Mixed Use "B" to zone district of Multiple Residence, <br />Single-Family cluster, and Single Family. <br />(Tabled at Plann;ng Commission meeting of July 9, 1991). <br />Withdrawn from meeting of September 24, 1991. <br />Mr. Grindell, attorney, the Reverend Mr. Kuhn and NIr. Molnar, represented Christ <br />The King. Mr.. Grindell explained that, pursuant to Section 1127.01 of the code, <br />they are requesting the Commission to initiate an ordinance rezoning the Christ <br />The King property, a 56 acre parcel located in the southwestern section of the <br />city bordering Olmsted Township and I-480. This property was originally zoned <br />Mixed Use "B", but as stated in the new Zoning Code (Section 1149.03-e) any land <br />zoned Mixed Use "B" prior to the adoption of the Zoning Code shall be herein <br />after designated Mixed Use "C". So what they are asking is to be rezoned from <br />Mixed Use "C". He listed the uses permitted tmder Mixed Use "C" pointing out that <br />these uses could be on a high impact scale, noting specifically an aids <br />laboratory. Their original request was to use 20.6 acres multi-family, 35.4 acres <br />cluster, and 3 lots single family, at that time they thought there was a window <br />which would have permitted the multi-family without a referendum, it is now their <br />understandirxg that there would have to be a referendum. At the last meeting there <br />were several concerns. One was that there was only one access from the property <br />to Barton Road, they now have a recorded 65 foot access easement through Olmsted <br />Township to Cook Road. Another concern was that there were no concept drawings of <br />what is to be built, he pointed out that the church is not here with development <br />plans, they are only seeking to rezone the property in order to sell it. He <br />advised that this is a financial burden on the church and now, because the <br />lender, Ameritrust, is being taken over by Society Bank, the pressure that the <br />Church had been experiencing before will become even greater. Finally, the <br />Commission also had a concern about who would be developing the property. He <br />advised that Hennie Homes held the option on the property and presented two <br />plans, one showing how the property could be developed under the existing zoning <br />with 103 duplex buildings (206 units), and the second plan under the cluster <br />zoning with 107 triplex buildings (row houses) with 321 lmits (336 would be <br />allowed under the Cluster Zoning). He advised that the the duplex buildings would <br />add 28 to 30 million dollars to the tax base; the triplex proposal would add <br />about 48 million dollars to the tax base. About 122 single family homes could be <br />built on this property, but half of these would be adjacent to the freewaya A <br />wetland study has been done and presently the land is developable under the <br />4