Laserfiche WebLink
<br />acre parcel for office use; a 6 acre parcel for hotel use; and a 4 acre parcel <br />for hotel use as outline in the judgement entry with the City. He clarified that <br />at present there are two lots, a 17.56 acre parcel which is the site of the <br />Butternut Ridge Apartments, and this 25 acre parcel which is being discussed this <br />evening. It was clarified that the zoning of this parcel is still "A" <br />Residential. Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that the owner has a court <br />judgement that the parcel is to be developed in a certain fashion. Mre Berryhill <br />supplied a copy of the judgement and Mr. Dubelko stated that it appeared to <br />comply basically with the agreement, but there might be a slight variation, <br />perhaps a hundredth of a foot. In reference to the easement, Mro Berryhill <br />explained that they are proposing a 60 foot wide easement for a private drive to <br />the landlocked parcel, this will be firmed up with a deed of declaration when <br />there is a more specific idea of what is going to be done on the site. In that <br />case, Mr. Dubelko stated that as a condition of the split, it should be <br />stipulated that an easement document must be filed at the time the plat is filed. <br />He also wanted to review the document prior to the filing. Their general counsel <br />did not want to submit a deed of declaration at this time because of the <br />ambiguities on this portion. They need to split it at this time for purposes of <br />financing. Mr. Dubelko advised that the easement doctunent giving sufficient <br />access to the rear parcel be recorded simultaneously with this plat, and if it is <br />not satisfactory it can be amended later. J. Thomas moved to approve <br />resubdivision of parcel rnunber 1 of the assembly and subdivision approved and <br />recorded in April of 1990 for Developers Diversified, Ltd. and W& Z. Properties <br />Ltd., for property located north of Butternut Ridge Road on the west side of <br />Great Northern Boulevard (and north - abutting the approved Butternut Ridge <br />Apartment site with the condition that once the resubdivision is submitted for <br />final approval an easement for parcel 1c which is acceptable to the Law <br />Department be provided simultaneouslye It is our understanding that this <br />subdivision is in compliance with the journal entry of November 23, 1988, <br />seconded by A. Skoulis, and unanimously approved. <br />A?'?j <br />V. COMMUNICATIONS : ?"' <br />An invitation was received for the Fourth =Z)attendtW Zoning Workshop, to be held <br />Friday, November 15, 1991. Mr. Orlowski and anyone else who <br />wants to attend should check with him. Mr. Thomas stated that the Commission did <br />have a commitment from Mayor Boyle that the City will pay for these seminars. <br />A letter from Building Commission Conway regarding two minor changes. <br />The first is for Danny Boys who would like to enclose permanently a former <br />temporary structure with awnings that was previously enclosed only during the <br />winter. Mr. Gorris agreed that this was merely a minor change and did not have to <br />be reviewed by the Commission. <br />The second one was a change to the colors of the former Sister's Chicken <br />Restaurant and the construction of a small addition on the rear for the new <br />restaurant, The Italian Oven. The Architectural Board has seen a copy of a <br />picture, but has requested to see an actual picture with the true colors. The <br />Commission believes that this review would be sufficient unless the owners did <br />not want to comply with the Architectural Board's requirements. <br />In reference to the Halleen proposal to install lights which the Commission had <br />accepted previously with the condition that the two lights abutting the <br />residential home be eliminated, Mrs. Duffy, the neighbor involved, has advised <br />that she has no objection to the lights. Mr. Conway pointed out that because of <br />the location of the garage there would be no impact on the house. The members had <br />no problem with elimina.ting the condition since it had been suggested for the <br />neighbors benefit. <br />6