06/19/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

for lighting the tennis court. In reference to the bill board sign, they will do nothing that does not conform to code, but if it is allowed a sign might be installed on the rear of a garage. Mr. Conway advised that the height of the chimneys do conform to code. He also clarified that the Conmnission was extremely concerned about the screening of the tennis court. Mr. Marshall stated they were thinking of eliminating the tennis court and in that case, Mr. Furman would like to leave the area natural since it is beautiful as is. It was decided to check the original plans which showed more detail. While they were waiting, Mr. Sohn again advised them what specific information was needed (specific colors, manufacturers, and niunber) for the review and that he would also like to see what type of pavers were L-o be used for the traffic circles. It was further decided that the developers would meet with Mr. Sohn at 6:30 p.m. prior to the Plann;ng Commission meeting and landscaping plans will be presented to Mr. Zergott separately. The developers reviewed the previously approved plans to get a better idea of what was required. Mr. Zergott gave them suggestions for landscaping as to which type of plant material would do best on certain elevations. Again, Mr. Furman questioned if the eliminated the tennis court, perhaps they could eliminate the berm since the pool could be set in the treeso They have not met with the forester as yet, but he was sent the original site plan, not the revised plan. Mr. Zergott explained that the forester had stated that the plans were too broad for him to comment, and because the location of the recreational area was changed, the forester could not use the previous plan which gave more specific information. A copy of the forester's report on the previous proposal would be given to the developers. A fence on the southern property had been mentioned by a resident, but had not been required by the Plann;ng Commission. The developers advised that they did prefer to use wood burning fireplaces, but the Commission had concerns about storing wood. They ma.intain that most of their residents keep the wood on their decks and it had never been a problem; but if it become a problem it would be a problem to the residents of the complex, not the adjacent neighbors. B. Zergott moved that at this point the Board cannot accept the plan as proposed until more specifics are provided, but we will be meeti.ng with the developers on Tuesday before the Plann;ng Commission meeting to go over some of these points so that theix plan can be submitted to Planning Commission at their meeting. The concept plan and materials are approved, however more specific information is needed: manufacturers names, specific colors, additional elevations of the clubhouse and the compactor screening, the sign, and also the berm and landscaping of the berm in the recreation area, seconded by Y. Sohn, and imanimously approved. Mr. Zergott agreed to meet with the developers at 6:30 also. 2) Predota Flooring, 29369 Lorain Road.. (Heard at this point) Proposal to construct a storage building. Referred by Planning Commission June 11, 1991e There was still no representative present; however, the Board agreed to review the proposal. There was a color rendering in the file. Mr. Conway explained that the retail area of the building had been presented previously, there are living quarters in the rear of the building as well as a residential garage on the .property. This building, which is basically a garage, will mainly be used to store and cut materialsa Mr. Zergott stated that this was really spreading the buildings over the property. Mr. Conway believed that Mr.Predota was maintaining separation to avoid installing a fire wall. The members would prefer that he remove the existing garage and construct one building. It was pointed out that he was Using a dark brown Texture 111 on this building, but 4