06/09/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Cooper 0'Leary Subdivision to combine and resubdivide the permanent parcel nos. 232-9-36 and 37, and 232-12-1 with the request that the developer provide a description of the easement to accompany the proposal, seconded by A. Skoulis, and tinanimously approvedm Mro Neff advised that they would present the easement prior to the Commission re-hearing the proposal. Chairman Gorris clarified that when this was heard again, the adjacent property owners would be notified. 2) View Point: Assembly, Resubdivision and Development Plats (4): A. North Olmsted Golf Course lot split and assembly plat. B. North 0]msted Golf Course Land Partition Plat. C. View Point Development Plat - Vista Home, 51 buildings. D. View Point Development Plat - Golf Homes, 55 buildings. The location is west of Canterbury Road and south of Butternut Ridge Road and I-480. Zoning is Single Family cluster, entirely, as per Ordinance No. 92-1. Mr. Bower, Shore West Construction, explained that these plats will enable them to implement the cluster home plan for the North 0]msted Golf Course property. Plat "A" combines all parcels into one; plat "B" divides the property between the golf course and the homes; plat "C" enables them, to deed out the homes in the Vista Home axea; and "D" enables them to deed out the property in the Go1f Homes area. The layout of the roads coincide with the previously approved plans. He clarified that the entire comrmn-ity consists of. the golf course and the two villages. He explained that the individual lmits will be deeded out fee simple to each owner, and tha.t there will be one home owners association for both areas< Mr. SkouTis questioned how the land under the Vista Homes could be divided since there might be upper units. Mr. Bower pointed out a schematic on the top of the drawing which explained how these imits would be described. City Engineer Deichmann-did not believe that the deed restriction previously required had been recorded. Mr. Bower responded that the restrietion to limit the use.of the golf course had been submitted to the title company but there had been some delay because the legal description had to be developed first and if these' have not been filed they will be shortly. Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that he had prepared the easement doctunent some time ago and had reviewed the other doctunents as well, i.ncluding the home owner's association document which met all the requirements of the Cluster Development Zoning. He ha.d looked at everything he needed to, but wanted to make sure that the access easements onto Canterbury Road ha.ve been recorded. Mr. Gorris would iike any approval given tonight to be conditioned on these deed restrictions conforming to what ha.d been requested previously. Mr. Bower explained to Mr. Skoulis how the ownership of the land could be divided in the Vista Home area: there are 3 units, A, B, and C, the second floor Zm.it will be described at a different height from sea level. Mr. Gorris pointed out that this was done frequently with comnercial property. Mr. Matheny, a resident on Canterbury Road, asked if the builder was goi.ng to guarantee that he would repair Canterbury Road and install sidewalks after the proposal was built. Mr. Deiehmann stated that he was not sure of all the details of the final agreement. Mr. Matheny maintained that this road will need to be widened and repaired after this project is completed. Mr. Bower stated that they had agreed to pay for sidewalks down the west side of Canterbury Road from the south end of their property to Butternut Ridge Road. In reference to repairing Canterbury Road, they intend to use a haul road off of Butternut Ridge/Canterbury intersection for phase one of the Vista Homes, however he will continue discussions with the City regarding stipulations for using Canterbury Road in the future. In reference to developers repairing roads, Mr. Skoulis believed that a developer would have to post a bond guaranteeing that a road damaged during 9