My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/22/1992 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1992
>
1992 Planning Commission
>
09/22/1992 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:10 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 6:17:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1992
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
9/22/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />had submitted a revised form which included the members' suggestions. Mr. Gorris <br />had found one discrepancy and was concerned that there were others. It was <br />decided to review these before continuing. Several changes were made: parcel 10 <br />should be Mixed Use "D"; 19 should be open space; 22 should be office; 33 is only <br />150 feet deep and should remain Single Family "A" for the present; 35 (city <br />owned) should be for senior residence district if it is ever developed; 45 to <br />senior residence; 47 remain as zoned; 48 remained as zoned; 49 open space or <br />recreation. Mr. Skoulis noted that it had been decided that parcel 37 should <br />remain as zoned (stated in minutes), the members agreed. These recommendations <br />will be revised so they are _all in agreement. Mr. Schultz then presented the <br />Strategic Management Plan and its implementation (see attached), and advised that <br />the goals and trends were evolved from discussions at a public meeting with North <br />Olmsted residents held a year ago. Residential Goals. During the discussion <br />several key points were made; the density of the senior residence district should <br />be lowered since the present zoning codes are geared to high rise apartments, <br />most seniors prefer a 1 to 3 story apartment which would have a density of about <br />20 to 25 tmits per acre. More stringent buffering requirements between retail and <br />residential should be stipulated in the Zoning Code, specifically min;mm widths, <br />height, density and maintenance of buffers should be stipulated, the office <br />district buffering restrictions are more superior. The Zoning Code should be <br />updated using the master plan as a guide and will indicate areas where changes <br />are needed, however the County Planning Corrunission is not under contract to do <br />this at present. Many of the programs to maintain the housing stock would not <br />necessarily be a functian of Planning Conun.ission, promoting them would be up to <br />the city administration. There is no large lot zoning district in the present <br />codes, however a mirLTmnn lot size of three quarter acre would have less impact on <br />Imunicipal services and schools. There are areas where this could be applied and <br />some developers might be interested in developing them if this zoning is created <br />in the code. Commercial Development Goals. Under this classification it was <br />explained that Lakewood had funding and programs to encourage businesses to <br />improve store fronts, after which the city does the street and sidewalk <br />improvements. Mr. Tressler stated that, as part of the Improvement Target Area <br />program, Community Development was surveying major arterial roads to note areas <br />which need improvement: street trees, sidewalk repair, or tree lawn improvement, <br />etc. Goals for Economic Development. In reference to the Industrial Park, it was <br />explained that Strongsville's new plan allows flexibility and promotes a campus <br />like setting including picnic and recreational facilities for enployees. Mr. <br />Orlowski noted that Strongsville had far more land for this purpose than North <br />Olmsted. Mr. Schultz speculated that the previously approved Plain Dealer pick-up <br />station and the possibility of relocating the bus garage to the Industrial Park <br />were not particularly good uses. Mr. Orlowski questioned i.f Mr. Schultz thought <br />that the practice of converting homes to offices and constructing storage <br />facilities in the rear could be hindering the growth of the park. Mr. Schultz <br />believed that could be a factor but he had no figures on it. He pointed out that, <br />besides location and tax abatements, most companies were looking for attractive <br />sites, and he believed that the above mentioned businesses not only detracted <br />from that, but did not generate income anticipated for the park. He pointed out <br />that Moen had been looking for an area with high visibility and one where they <br />could have some control. He further stated that originally it ha.d been decided <br />that the Industrial Park would not be studied with the master plan since it had <br />been planned for a specific purpose, but he did believe that the city should <br />start visualizing what the park is to become. Mr. Tressler presented the balance <br />of the plan, and explained that, in reference to the next issue, they are not <br />transportation engineers and are not really aware of the costs involved in <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.