Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, CITY OF NORTEI OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMNIISSION <br />MINTJTES-NOVIIKBIIt 10, 1992 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Gorris called the rieeting to order at 7:15 p.m. <br />Present: K. 0'Rourke, A. Skoulis, J. Thomas, and B. Gorris <br />Mr. Tallon arrived later. <br />Absent: L. Orlowski <br />Also Present: Councilman Lind, Assistant Law Director Dubelko, City Engineer <br />Deichmann, Building Connnissioner Conway, and Clerk of Commissions <br />Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />J. Thomas moved to approve the minutes of October 27, 1992 as presented, <br />seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br /> <br />No itemso <br />IV. NEtiJ DEVEIAPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br /> No items. <br />V. COrITNNICATIONS: <br /> No items. <br />VI. CON7MITTEE REPORTS : <br /> No iter,is. <br />VII. NE6d BLTSINESS : <br /> No items. <br />VIII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />The members discussed some minor changes. Building Comrriissioner Conway explained <br />that Velvet Touch Car Wash was requesting to relocate 3 lignting fixtures from <br />the south side of the Dover Center drive to the north side to save some trees and <br />also to eliminate a portion of the fence on the same drive in order to preserve <br />the hedges on the south side of the drive. rlr. Conway clarified that the owner of <br />the adjacent building did not taant the hedges removed so the fence «ould notv <br />start beyond the hedges. It was decided that this should go on to the <br />Architectural Review Boardo NTr. Gorris would like a letter from the adjacent <br />neighbor stating that he agrees to these changes. <br />The second minor change was the Szarka's proposal (now called Corso's). Board of <br />Zoning Appeals had required that a fence be installed on the eastern property <br />line. Now the owners are requesting a fence across the front of the house that is <br />on the same property and which would then return south from the driveway. The <br />Architectural Board originally requested that the house be painted to match the <br />restaurant. It was decided to refer this to the Architectural Board as we11. It <br />was clarified that these proposals did not have to return to the Planning <br />Cor?mission after the Architectural Board.