Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Thomas advised that Cap'n. Taco had strobe lights in the window which is very <br />very distracting and questioned if this were allowed under the code. The Building <br />Department will look into this as it is regulated by the sign code. <br />Mr. Skoulis questioned exactly what latitude the Commission had in respect to <br />signs, specifically those that are going to be installed with a project that is <br />going through the approval process. Building Commissioner Conway stated that <br />these signs are usually on the building plans and the A.R.B. looks at them for <br />concept. Mr. Skoulis stated that it is hard for him to visua.lize what some of <br />these signs are going to look like, pointing out that the pole sign for Sun T.V. <br />did not appear to be so big. He also did not realize that the Butternut Ridge <br />Apartments were going to be 3 stories. Mr. Gorris responded that they found a <br />loop hole in the code, because originally Planning Commission believed that only <br />two and a half story apartments with a half story below grade were allowed. <br />Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that that was not necessarily a loop hole, <br />but the code could be changed if the Commission was not happy with it. Mr. Conway <br />stated that this idea was proposed with another apartment developer who first <br />proposed a half of story below grade and then changed to this concept. <br />Study of the rough draft of the Master Plan. <br />Mr. Gorris advised that his plan was to formulate a series of questions based an <br />tonight's discussion which could be forwarded County Planning Commissione Prior <br />to doing that, Mr. Thomas suggested that the members give their opinions of the <br />plan. Councilman Lind stated that he read all of it but the last chapter, the <br />Strategic Management Plan, which woul.d require the most study. Mr. Skoulis <br />believed the plan was too big and cumbersome; too much detail in areas where the <br />detail was not needed; some erucial areas were not specific enough; it was not <br />indexed well (tabs would be helpful); and it was too repetitious particularly in <br />the focus areas. Mr. Gorris ha.d concentrated on the Strategic Management Plan and <br />believed it was too general, too theoretical, and needed more practical <br />suggestion. Mr. Thomas agreed, suggesting that perhaps the Commission had not <br />given enough guidance; one primary goal had been the rezoning of the western end <br />of Lorain Road where they merely reeommended some spot zoning of vacant land. Too <br />much time and detail had been spent on bike paths and sidewalks. There were <br />discrepancies in traffic figures: such as, if all rer.iaining retail acreage were <br />developed, 33,000 additional trips would be generated per day, btat earlier they <br />had told the Commission that -if Wal-Mart developed their 13.5 acres it would <br />result in 9,000 to 11,000 trips per day which would be a third of what the <br />remaining retail would incur if developed. He agreed the plan is too detailed <br />with too much emphasis on urban planning. Mrs. 0'Rourke liad not participated in <br />the early discussions, however, she thought that this was a basic plan which had <br />been slotted for cities of various sizes and believed that the same things would <br />be said for any city with 34,000 people with a similar number of retail <br />establishments, retail eorridors; etco As an example of that, Mr. Gorris pointed <br />out that in the discussion of landscaped buffers to screen residential from <br />commercial, they stated, that 2 feet might not be enough, but 50 might be too <br />much, however they never addressed whether the 15 feet that is required by North <br />Olmsted within the 50 foot setback is good, bad or indifferent. Mr. Thomas noted <br />that items in the Strategic Management Plan on page 4 actually should be in a <br />residential property maintenance code, which the Building Department could <br />ac3minister, and he did not rer.iember this -issue as one of the goals. Mr. Gorris <br />stated that the orderly development of Lorain Road west of Stearns was one of the <br />Commission main goals, but was not specifically mentioned, there was only a <br />paragraph dealing with protectin; residential neighborhoods from commercial <br />encroachment and statistics advising that commercial space would be increased by <br />2