12/02/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. Gerald Nobleman, 23968 Amesbury Drive. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance for non-conforming shed that was remodeled (was over 50% deteriorated): requires 27 square foot variances for area exceeding 2% coverage of rear yard and also request 4 foot variance from side property line and 9 foot variance from rear property line for location of shed. Violation of Ord. 90°125, Section 1135.02(d)1&4. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was adninistered to Mr. and N1rs. Nobleman, and to neighbors, Mrs. I?ennis and Mrs. Radden. Mr. Gomersall explained that this was a non-conforming shed that was reriodeled without a building permit. He also stated that in 1984 they ha,d a non- conforrAng pool which was to be removed. Mr. Nobleman advised that this had been resolved in court and he presented a letter which explained that the courts had ruled that the pool could stay. Law Director Gareau agreed that this issue had been resolved. Mrs. Dennis, the abutting neighbor who is also Mr. Noble.man's sister, advised that she di.d not object to the shed which is next to her yard and maintained that his is the nicest yard in the neighborhood. Mr. Nobleman stated that he did not luiow that he needed a permi.t to rebuild a shed that was existing. Mrs. Radden, the neighbor on the other side of the property, believed that the back yard was crowded with too many structures, and is concerned about more bui.ldings being construeted. Mrs. Nobleman stated that they had tried to purchase some of the School Board property behind.them but had not been successful. Mr. Grace noted that there was no other place to put a shed. B. Grace moved to grant the request of Gerald Nobleinan, 23968 Amesbury Drive, for a variance for a non- conforming shed that was remodeled (was over 50% deteriorated): to grant a 27 square foot variance area exceeding 2% coverage of rear yard, a 4 foot variance from side property line and a 9 foot variance from rear property line for location of shed, seconded by W. Purper, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 5. Bob Mate. 24132 Elm Roade Request for variance (1123.12). Request 1 foot 3 inch side yard variance to construct an addition which will be located between the house and the garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.07. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Mate who 2Xplained that this would be a 2 story addition. He would like this addition to follow the rear line of the existing garage. Mr. Gomersall advised that a fire wall would be requireda N'tr. Mate is also thinking about building a new garage with a.footer, since the existing garage is on a floating slab. He would still need the 1 foot 3 inch variance since the lot is narrow. Building Commissioner Conway asked that this request be incorporated in the motion so that if he does rebuild the garage it will be included and he will not have to return to the Board. J. Maloney moved to grant to Bob Mate, 24132 Elm Road, a 1 foot 3 foot side yard variance to construct an addition which will be located between the house arid the garage and that if a new garage is rebuilt the same variance will apply arnd in addition a fire wall will be mandatory between the garage and the house in the construction plans, seconded by B. Grace, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 6. Jennifer's Convertibles. 26037 Lorain Road. No representative present. Request delayed until the end of the meeting. 7. Barry E. Paden, 23831 Ma.ple Ridge Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 4 foot 6 inch variance for distance between existing garage and addition; request 34 square foot variance for 2