Laserfiche WebLink
• , .L , <br />pass. B. Gomersall moved that relative to the request for a variance to display <br />vehicles for sale in the 75 foot front setback on the Halleen Truck Lot violation <br />of Ord. 90-125, Section 1139.07, item 1 on the agenda, that the Board make a <br />finding tha.t provision three of Section 1123.12(a)3 that the request was within <br />the spirit of the code and not contrary to the intent of the code has been <br />substantiated, seconded by W. Purper. Roll call on motion, Gomersall, Purper, <br />Grace, Ferencik, and Maloney, no. Motion failed to pass. Regarding the pole sign, <br />Mr. Gareau again advised that the finding should be substantiated on the same <br />three criteria. B. Gomersall moved that relative to the relocation of a <br />prohibited pole sign from 27871-81 Lorain Road to 27932 Lorain Road for the <br />Halleen Truck lot, this Board finds that tmder Section 1123.12(a)1 that an <br />unnecessary hardship has been substantiated, seconded by B. Grace. Roll call on <br />motion: Gomersall, Grace, Ferencik, Maloney, and Purper, no. Motion failed to <br />pass. B. Gomersall moved that relative to the relocation of a prohibited pole <br />sign from 27871-81 Lorain Road to 27932 Lorain Road for the Halleen Truck lot, <br />this Board finds that under Section 1123.12(a)2 that the rufusal to grant a <br />variance would deprive the applicant of a substantial property right, seconded by <br />W. Purper. Roll call on motion: Gomersall, Purper, Grace, Ferencik, and Maloney, <br />no. Motion failed to pass. B. Gomersall moved that relative to the relocation of <br />a prohibited pole sign from 27871-81 Lorain Road to 27932 Lorain Road for the <br />Halleen Truck lot, this Board finds that tmder Section 1123.12(a)3 that the <br />request was within the spirit of the code and not contrary to the intent of the <br />code has been substantiated, seconded by S. Ferencik. Roll call on motion: <br />Gomersall, Ferencik, Grace, Maloney, and Purper, no. Motion failed to passo R. <br />Gomersall moved that regarding the request for variance by the Halleen Chevrolet <br />Truck lot, 27932 Lorain Road, the request for a variance to display vehicles for <br />sale in the 75 foot front setback, violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1139.07 and <br />also the request variance to relocate prohibited pole sign from 27871-81 Lorain <br />Road be approved, secondecl by B. Grace. Roll call on motion: Gomersall, Grace, <br />Ferencik, Maloney, and Purper, no. Motion failed to pass. Variances deniede <br />C. & C Realty (changed from B.B.&C.)(Affordable Cars and Finance), 27724 Lorain <br />Road. <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to display vehicles for sale in <br />75 foot front setback. . Vi.olation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1139.07 (see table). <br />Also request variance for individual store signage on ground sign, request 1 foot <br />variance for location of ground sign, and request 50 square foot variance for <br />total sign area allowed for a business imit. Violations of Ord. 90-125, Section <br />1163.12 (h) & (B) and 1163,11(c). <br />Proposal continued from meeting of March 4, 1992. A proposed landscape plan for <br />the existing planting area will be presented at the meetinge <br />Variance granted for canopy sign and balance of proposal continued from meeting <br />of April 1, 1992. <br />Mr. Giesser and Mre Halleen had been sworn in from the previous case. Mr. <br />Giesser advised that earlier they had asked that the request for the variance to <br />display vehicles for sale in the 75 foot front setback be withdrawn, but it was <br />still shown on the agenda. This is no longer an issue. The only item now being <br />requested is for the ground sign. Mr. Giesser did not believe that they needed a <br />1 foot setback variance for the sign, if there is one needed they will move the <br />sign back 1 foot. It was clarified that the drawing showed the sign five foot <br />from the sidewalk and trie property line is 1 foot inside the sidewalk. Mr. <br />Giesser stated that the sign would be located so that it would conform. The <br />members had no problem with this request. Chairman Gomersall advised the members <br />that he was going to make a riotion which would preclude going through all the <br />10