01/12/1993 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? rear of the parcel and had.an easement through the Bob Evans drive. He would like this rezoned to some compatible zoning classification to the zoning to the rear. Mr. Dubelko advised that if this is zoned to Multi-Family, a referendum would be required. Mr. Burskin stated that they can increase the square footage of parcel "B" by moving the line back, and possibly could decrease the frontage in order to give parcel "A" some Lorain Road frontage on Lorain. TZr. Dubelko stated that the code allows the development of a General Retail parcel under the zoning classification of the abutting parcel and if this property is subdivided a restrictive covenant could be included restricting the development to miil.ti- family purposes (if the abutting property is zoned Multi-Family). Mr. Dubelko, agreed that to write such a covenant. Since this property is being used by United Survey for storing their trucks and as a neeting place, Mr. Burskin questioned if this U.se could continue imtil the property is sold. Mr. Conway advised that this use could remain as a non-conform;ng use, but if the use chariges it would have to conform to whatever is specifiecl. It svas clarified that the ownership could change, but the use would have to remain the same. Again Mr. Burskin advised that block "B" could be enlarged so that it would conforri to the code. Mr. Randell, a representative of Forest City Auto Parts, vieiaed the plans and the proposal and the restrictive covenant was explained to him. There had been some discussion of splitting of the property abutting Forest City Auto Parts and Meinke Muffler and. adding it to those properties. He was advised that if they bought a portion, they could use it for parking, if it met code and if there was access to Lorain Road, no access would be allowed onto a residential street. His company had no immediate plans to acquire the property. Mr. Deichmarm stated that if a neia plat was submitted showing the property line moved, the location of the exi.sting building should be shown on the plat, to determine whether or not a non- conforming setback was being created. Mr. Burskin stated that they are moving the line away from the building. J. Thomas moved that C.E.I. is going to redraw the plat to create a conforming lot in block "B" to maintain the 40,000 square foot requirement. The Assistant Law Director is going to come up with a proposal for a restrictive covenant that will follow the newly created parcel that will restrict its General Retail.use exc?ept? J?obs a use that is compatible tJith the adjacent rau.lti-fami.ly, seconded -:ny and tmanimously approved. Mr. Dubelko asked for a copy of the lease that C.E.I. has with United Survey. 3) Gurt Dunlap Assembly and Subdivision Plat (Hastings Drive). The proposal is to combine and re-subdivide Permanent Parcel Nos. 234-22-14, 27, 28, 35, and 234-22-32 into two (2) sublots. Location is the south side of Hastings Drive abutting I-480 right-of-way at Stearns Road. Zoning is "B" Residence, Sinble, entirely and both sublots conform to the Zoning Code Requirements. Mr. Dunlap presented the plat and explained that these lot back up to I-480 and are the remnants of the former parcels. His house is on sublot 1 and fie will be building on sublot 2. He has owned the rear portion of sublot 2 and just acquired a lot on the front. The members had no problem with the proposal. B. Gorris moved to accept the Curt Dunlap Assembly and Subdivision Plat, the proposal tQycombine and resubdivide Permanent Parcel Nos. 234-22-14, 27, 28, 35, and 234-22-32 into two (2) sublots. Location is the south side of Hastings Drive abutting I-480 right of way at Stearns Road. Zoning is "B" Residence, Single, entirely and both sublots conforr:l to the Zoning Code Requirements, seconded by L. Orlowski, and unanimously approved. V. COMKNICATIONS : Letter from Building Coru:?issioner Conway requesting approval of some minor