Laserfiche WebLink
figures in the report on pages 11 and 9 and believed that these figures could be <br />construed to show less traffic and believed that a third coltunn should be added <br />to include the drive-by traffic. Mr. Lepisto stated that there would be many more <br />combined trips in North Olmmsted since shoppers would go to the Mall and stop at <br />Wal-Mart, which is not the case in Mentor. Mr. Orlowski doubted the accuracy of <br />these figures since the voltune of traffic on the secondary streets is <br />considerable. Mr. Griffith believed that the 25% that was Used for existing <br />traffic was conservative. Mr. Thoma,s noted that County Planning Comnission <br />estimate of 10,000 cars per day entering the site differed with Wal-Mart's <br />figures of 3,700 cars; and it was clarified later that the 3,700 was peak hour <br />traffic and the CPC figure was for a 24 hour period. Mr. Lepisto advised that <br />peak hours are from 5 to 6<00 p.m. during the week and 12 noon to 1:00 p.m. on <br />Saturday; and estimated that there would be about 1,100 cars an hour on Saturday <br />and about 700 cars during the peak hour on weekdays. He contended that if the <br />traffic can be handled during the peak hours, other hours will present no <br />problem. Mr. Gorris noted that.in the minutes of the first meeting,. Mr. Newberry <br />questioned the rnunber of 10,000 to 11,000 cars per day since Wal-Mart estimates <br />3,700 per day into their other facilities, and pointed out tha.t their peak hours, <br />2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. which differs from the rush hour. Mr. Newberry stated that. <br />he read the figures incorrectly and these figures, taken from the Mentor store; <br />showed the ingress/egress movement during 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 pem. and agreed that . <br />County Plaruiing Commission's estimate was reasonable, but the peak hours are the <br />problem times. Mr. Lepisto stated that they always look at a worst ca,se scenario. <br />He agreed that option rnunber 3 was preferable in that the Lorain Road access was <br />located further from the Dover, Center/Lorain intersection. Mr. Gorris read the <br />Safety Depaxtment report (see attached) which pertained to the original plan <br />using the former Sherwin Williams drive. Mr. Tallon believed that.the Commission <br />must consider the projected traffie figures for the year 2000 for pover Center <br />and Porter Road. If these projections are with split an additional 5000 cars <br />there would be 15,900 trips per clay on Porter Road and 21,000 per day on Dover <br />Center and this impact will be felt, not only by the residents of these streets, <br />but by the residents of the developments off of them. He noted that residents <br />cannot get out of the driveways or developments at present. The impact of this <br />development on the city does not stop at Mill, Dover Center, Porter and Lorain <br />Road, it wi.ll impact the entire length of these streets and also Butternut Ridge <br />Road. Mr. Thomas pointed out that the 10,000 car per day is not actua.lly per.day, <br />since most of this traffic will occur during the 12 hour period when the store is <br />open (9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.). When Mr. Lepisto disagreed, Mr. Thomas asked how <br />Wal-Mart could generate traffic when the store is closed, estimating.that there <br />might be as many as 9,000 cars generated in a 12 hour period. It was clarified <br />that these figures were based on trips (in and out) not cars. Mr. Tallon also <br />questioned their figures estimatin.g traffic on Mill Road and maintained that most <br />traffic coming south bound on Porter Road will use the Mill Road entrance. Mr. <br />Skoulis remi.nded the members that Rally's will a=1so be on the corner of Dover <br />Center-and Lorain. Mr. Griffith clarified that there is a difference between cars <br />and trips, one car generally represents two trips. Mr. Gorris saw. nothing <br />compelling in this traffic report that indicated the necessity of ingress or <br />egress on Mill Road. Mre Thomas stated that the report showed him how r,cuch.of an <br />investment in money, city services, etc., this development would ha.ve on the <br />city, as well as the negative impact.it will have. He believed that the million <br />dollar estimate to alter the infrastructure is conservative, and that, along with <br />the negative impact to the residential areas to accommodate a single business is <br />awesome. Mr. Lepisto stated that these improvements will have to be made whether <br />this development goes through or not. In response to Mr. Newberry's questions, <br />Mr. Deichmann advised that his estimated cost for improvements to the <br />2