Laserfiche WebLink
and amin;mum width of 15 feet with the notation that the mounding proposed on <br />the drawing just received is not appropriate for the residents in the area since <br />there is a sharp fall coming from the mound to the residential area with a gentle <br />slope going back to Wal-Mart, and that this mound should. be reviewed by the <br />ArchitectU.ral Review Board and the eity forester to provide the least problPms <br />resulting from that mound to the adjacent residents; that additional landscaping <br />for the parking lot be shown that includes the ratio of one tree for every 10 <br />spaces; that the city forester be consulted for his input concerning the <br />salvation for many of the ma.ture, healthy trees now on the site and not in the <br />footprint of the building; that a pedestrian traffic pattern be established in <br />and around the site showing sidewalks, crosswalks, and right-of-ways; that an <br />expanded view of the site be provided showing all curb cuts as a result of the <br />revision of the plan, as well as adjacent retail establishments in the area along <br />Dover, Porter, and Lorain Roads; that the building be designed with no <br />merchandise or shopping carts. stored or displayed on the exterior; that Wal-Mart <br />meet with the representatives of the neighborhood to review the revised plan; <br />that a study of the ambient noise level be presented to the Safety Department and <br />the A.R.B. in order for them to make a determ-imtion of the appropriate height <br />and width of the mound and that the height and width of the mound as established <br />in the motion be an initial guide and a startin; point. Prior to voting on the <br />motion, it was noted that the motion should be amended to include the balance of <br />the original 13 points : that th& revised plan should also try to incorporate 'a <br />shared traffic pattern among many of the high traffic retail establishments that <br />are contiguous along Lorain and Dover Road; that the Engineering Department <br />should study the capacity of the surrouneling storm sewers to determine whether or <br />not any increased capacity has to, be established; and that the garden center <br />could have outside displays. The motion was. seconded by B. Gorris, and <br />unanimously approved. During the framing of the motion, Mr. Deichmann stated that <br />the ambient or existing noise level, and based on the characteristics of the <br />truc.ks that taill be malcing deliveries, it can be determined the projected impact <br />on the ambient noise level, as well as what.other noises will go along with the <br />development. They could then project what type of screening or noise level could <br />muffle or reduce that level. It was clarified that this would be returned to the <br />Plam2i.ng Commission, and the residents were advised to call the Building <br />Department to see when this will be returning. Mr. Newberry addressed the <br />audience and stated that there had been a lot of input from the neighbors and it <br />was not surprising that there were so many complaints about the traffic problems. <br />The traffic situation in North Olmsted is critical, and the reason the traffic <br />situation is rampant on Porter Road is because there is no other through route <br />between I-90 to I-480 so that traffic uses the residential streets, Porter, Mi11 <br />and Dover Center Roads. The residents expressed.dismay at the traffic as it <br />Px;sts today and this situation cannot be ignored even if the Wal-Mart.proposal <br />does not materialize. He urged the residents to keep after the city to improve <br />the infrastructure as it stands today. This condition will not improve unless <br />certain improvements are made to the roads, streets, and traffic signals. In <br />response to some of the questions raised earlier he advised that it would take <br />25,000 transactions per week to make a Wal-Ma.rt store profitable; the nearest <br />4dal-Mart to go out of business was in Earn; Texas which is an oil ghost town, <br />there is no other to his lmowledge. Storm water is a major concern since the only <br />drainage outlet is a culvert under pover Center Road, south of the proposed <br />drive on Dover. It is the developer's responsibility not. to impact the drainage <br />situation in that location. Regardin,g the concern over the potential increase in <br />crime, decrease of property values, or the negative effect an small businesses, <br />there have been studies done by certain individuals that shows that Wal-Mart <br />7