Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />neighbors clid not want the property re-zoned. However, it is the burden of the <br />property owner to come forward and present evidence of why the property should be <br />re-zoned, and economics must be considered and although he is not entitled to the <br />best return on his investment, he must be able to get a reasonable return. The <br />property awner must present evidence that he cannot feasibly develop his property <br />' as it is zoned. He did not believe that-the developers have presented that type <br />of evidence this evening. Mr. Lynch reiterated that this lot has been for sale <br />for four years, and believed that this should be enough evidence. L. Orlowski <br />moved to approve tha Lusardo Rezoning Request to rezone the Permanent Paxcel no. <br />232-20-5 from "A" Residence Single to Residence, 2 Family, seconded by B. Gorrism <br />Roll ca11 an motion: Orlowski, Gorris, 0'Rourke, Skoulis, and Tallon, no. Motion <br />failed to pass. Proposal was denied. V. COMMUNICATIONS: <br />No items. <br />VI. COMNIITTEE REPORTS : <br />No items. <br />VII. NEW BUSINESS: <br />No items. <br />VIII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />The County Planning Commission will be discussing the master plan at the next <br />meeting. . <br />IX. ADJOURNMIINT: <br />B. Gorris moved to excuse the absence of Mr. Thomas; seconded by Mr. Orlowski, <br />and linaninously approved. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. <br /> <br />B. Oring, Clerk"of Conunissions