04/27/1993 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2) Kahn's Cuisine, 23135 Lorain Road. Proposal to renovate entrance area of restaurant. Heard by Architectural Review Board April 21, 1993. No representative was present. (Tabled at the end of the meeting). 3) Oldsmobile of North Olmsted (formerly Halleen Truck Lot), 27871 Lorain Road. Heard by Architectural Review Board on January 20, 1993. WITIiDRAWN BY DEVELOPER UNTIL MAY 25. 1993. This will be heard on May 25, 1993. 4) Little Cottage Doll House, 30036 Lorai Proposal to determine if "Reader and specified in section 1139.01(b) and as Tabled from meeting of March 23, 1993. n Road. Ad.visor" is a like and similar use as required in section 1123.10. No representative was present. Vice Chairman Orlowski called for a motion. A. Skoulis moved to approve the proposal to determine if "Reader and Advisor" is a like and similar use as specified in seetion 1139.01(b) and as required in section 1123e10, seconded by R. Tallon. Roll call on motion: Skoulis, Tallon, and Orlowski, no. Mr. Thomas, yes. Motion failed to pass. IV. NEW DEVELOPMIIVTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Assembly and Lot Split Plat, Resubmission. The proposal is to combine and re-subdivide all or part of Permanent Parcel Nos. 237-5-1, 237-5-3, 237-5-23 and 237-7-18 into two (2) parcels. This revised proposal was originally reviewed by Plaming Commission on January 12, 1993. Withdrawn by developer from meeting of April 13, 1993. Mr. Buerskin, represented Cleveland ] Tartabini, represented United Survey, decision on the restrictive covenant Director Dubelko explained that the Brendan Lane does not conform to the have su.fficient frontage, the code ree and it is a split zoned lot. He stat since the subdivision created a retai: with no limitation as to what could go the city had any real concerns about i Survey, but if the lot split was grante any retail use. Because the Commission use, other than United Survey, would ha zoning, he had advised either re-zoni covenant limiting the use to multi-i Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company the buver an easement for the ri-aht of lectric Illwninating Company and Mr. J. and advised that they needed a legal from the Law Department. Assistant Law second lot fronting on David Drive and ;oning Code in two respects: it does not .iires 150 feet and this only has 100 feet ed that Plaming Commission had concerns lot with frontage only on side streets in there. Neither Plaming Commi.ssion or he present use of the property by United 1, the lot could be used in the future for rould like to make certain that any future Te to conform to the adjacent multi-family ig the property or placing a restrictive amily on it. Mr. Buerskin stated that was willing and had planned on granting access for a 60 foot driveway to Lorain Road. He asked if this easement would change the requirement tor a restrictive covenant. Mra Dubelko noted that this situation would be similar to the Bob Evans' property which has another business belund it, and that would be up to the Plaming Commission. He stated that the whole proposal ha,s been on hold because he wanted the city to deal with both the present owner and the buyer. He will prepare the restrictive covenant as long as the buyer agrees to it, but United Survey's attorney had indicated that they might not agree to it. Mr. Tartabini stated that their attorney had indicated that there was no need for him to be present since it was up to the Commission to issue the restrictive covenant. 2