09/28/1993 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 bring them back to this committee when they return. The Comnission would like the drawings amended to make sure the front four landbanked parking spaces conform to the code as outlined by Mr. Conway tonight. The Conmiission would like the developer to address the questions of Mr. Orlowski as they relate to adjusting the curbing at the interseetion of the one way entrance at the easternmost driveway to insure that the vehicles -stay within the one way driveway and do not come back across the lawn. The Commission asks that the developer consider speed btunps as an additional traffic control. It is our understanding that the canopy that will surround the building will not be back lit. That when these plans are presented to the Architectural Review Board the developer will have changed the height of the trash enclosure to 6 foot: The Commission would like the Architectural Board to give the developer arxy input they can as it relates to the possibility of additional landscaping on the rear portion of the parcel where it abuts the residential property. Also ask the Engineering Department to review the area where the tree lawn had been removed previously. The motion was seconded by L. Orlowski, and unanimously approved. During the framing of the motion, Mr. Skoulis again asked that Engineering look into the timing of the lights. Mr. Deichmarm responded that under the new traffic signal system the lights will be actuated by the riumber of vehicles using the signals. Mr. Gorris clarified that he would like the Engineering Department to look into anything that would relate to safely permitting traffic to ingress and egress this parcel considering that the eastern most drive empties right into the riiddle of the intersection. The developers discussed the remaining metings needed for approval and it was clarified that this proposal would probably be through the entire proeess by Noveriber 16th. Mr. Benik was advised that Mr. Griffith would be reviewing this as soon as possible. Mr. Gorris ca.lled for a short recess. V.- COMMUNICATIONS: Regarding the Halleen lawsuit, Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that they have received a letter from Mr. Giesser, attorney, offering a compromise regarding the landscape buffer which is now in court. The Law Department will present this to the Board of Zoning Appeals. VI. COMNNRTTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Gorris has asked Assistant Law Director Dubelko to draft legislation for the rezonings which will implement the master plan. This will be presented to Council in stages. Council has accepted the master plan as a whole, but then they may accept or reject the rezoning as it is presented. The Commission must decide which areas are the most critical and should be submitted first. Mr. Skoulis would also like to discuss changing the wording of the requirements of the Cluster Home section at the same time. It was decided to have a special meeting on Monday, October 4, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. VIII. OLD BUSIIVESS: Revised site plan for Rally's Restaurant, 27208 Lorain Road. Building Commissioner Conway advised that Rally's had some changes to their originally approved plans. Mr. Pepperny, architect for Rally's, and Mr. Gilbert, representing Rally's, presented these changes. There had been a lack of communication between the local architect, Mr. Pozek, and Rally'so Their plan showed red tile with red grout below the window, and a band of white through the window band with red tile above that again with matching grout. The paint colors 7