My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/07/1993 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1993
>
1993 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
07/07/1993 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:31 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 7:31:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1993
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/7/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was <br />administered to Mr. Heim and Mrs. Gross, the neighbor next door next to the <br />addition. Mrs. Gross believed that this request will devalue her property and <br />noted that there is enough roon on the other side of the garage for the addition. <br />She also thought that this will make her drainage problems worse. The raembers did <br />not agree that this would cause a drainage problem and that it would not devalue <br />the property. Mr. Grace and Mr. Gomersall believe that there would be ample room <br />in the back for an addition. Mre Grace thought that 2 feet would cause a safety <br />hazard in case of a fire since it would be difficult to get around. Mr. Maloney <br />believed that the rain will flow down on to the neighbors property and there <br />would not be enough room to maintain that side. Mr.. Heim believed that this <br />setback area is wasted space. Mr. Heim asked if he could reduce it to a 2 foot <br />variance. Neither Mr. Maloney nor 14r. Grace could agree to this since there is so <br />much property in the rear. J. Nlaloney moved to gran)- Thomas E. Heiri, 24128 <br />Mapleridge Road the request for variance a 3 foot side yard variance to construct <br />addition to detached garage, seconded by R. Gomersall. Roll call on motion: <br />Maloney, Gomersall, Grace, and Koberna, no. Motion failed to pass. Variance <br />clenied. <br />3`. David and Verna Kokita, 7139 Barton Road. <br />Request for variance (1123.12).- 12equest 425 square foot variance for area of <br />accessory building exceeding 2% of rear yard area; also requires a 6 foot height <br />variance; and a 5 foot rear setback variance. Accessory building to be used for <br />storage and a game room. Violations of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1135.02(d)-(1), (3), <br />and (4). <br />Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was <br />administered to Mr. Kokita and Mr. Haas, a neighbor who lived south of him, it <br />was explained to him that the builcling will be on the north east corner. Mr. Haas <br />has no objection since this is on the other side of his lot. The mer.ibers believed <br />the building is too big for- the back yard and much too high. It was pointed out <br />that this would be almost as big as the house next door. iMr. Grace noted that <br />there was no one present objecting to it, but it was noted that a neighbor <br />receivi.ng the notice would have no idea how high it would be. Mr. Kokita <br />explained that the upstairs was to be a game room for his children and it would <br />be used for storage downstairs. The members noted this was as large as some <br />houses, but they were more concerned about the height. After some discussion <br />pertaining to the construction, it was discovered that there would be a deck as <br />well. Mr. Kokitka agreed to continue this until the next meeting and look into <br />lowering the structure as much as possible. Mra Sanker advised that 7 foot, 6 <br />inches is the legal height of the ceiling. Continued until next meeting. <br />4• GTE Mobilnet, 26791 Brookpark Ext. <br />Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to display inflatable mobile <br />phone on roof of building.,Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.04(g). <br />Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was <br />administered to Ms. Meister representing GTE A7obilnet. The balloon will be 12 <br />feet high. The members had no problem with this but would like a letter submitted <br />from the owner of the property that he would allow the ballon on his building. R. <br />Gomersall moved to grant the request to GTE Mobilnet, 26791 Brookpark Ext. To <br />display inflatable mobile phone on roof of building for the period of August 2 <br />through 7th, seconded by B. Grace, and tmanimously approved. Variance granted. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.