05/10/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

sale signs were posted inside the windows, not outside an the property. The only time they use an "A" frame sign is to advertise for employees, but this is not done frequently. Building Commissioner Conway advised that they had needed a 3 foot setback variance for the sign, but the rest of the sign was in compliance. It was clarified that there was a slight mound with landscaping around the sign. Mr. Conway advised that the are .3 spaces over the required number of parking spaces. Mr. Gorris clarified that the signage.indicating "Head in Parking Only" applied to spaces 8 to 22. He asked if the "Stop Here on Red" sign would remain for the stores across Sparky Lane even though the one Wendy's drive is being eliminated. Mr. Deichmarm was not sure and would discuss this with Mr. Griffith. Mr. Deichmann further advised Mr. Thoma.s that the he did not kmow of any cost that the city might be incurring for this project. The members had no further questions on this proposal. J. Thomas moved to approve the proposal to construct the addition to Wendy's Restaurant and the reconfiguration of the parking area, incorporating all the recommendations of the Architectural Review Board, the Board of Zoning Appeals, as well as those of the Safety, Engineering and Building Departments. The Commission also requests that the developer modify, in cooperation with the Engineering Department, the landscaping near the Lorain Road entrance to encourage more of a right,turn entrance into the development. Further the Cornnission requests tlZat the Law'Department review the easement agreement and pass it on to the B.Z.D. Committee with any recommendations that they might have, seconded by L. Orlowski, and unanimously approved. II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NffNUTES: (Heard at this point.) There were no corrections to the minutes of March 22nd. L. Orlowski moved to approve the minutes of Aiarch 22, 1994, as-submitted, seconded by K. 0'Rourke, and unanimously approved. In the minutes of April 26.th, Mr.. Miller had asked that on page 5, half way down, change the word could to would. "Mr. Miller asked if the display.would spill over into the truck turnaround area ..." L. Orlowski moved to approve the minutes of April 26th as.corrected, seconded by J. Thomas. Orlowski, Thomas, Alston, and Gorris, yes. Mrs. 0'Rourke abstained. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: :No items. V. COMM[JNICATIONS: . No items. VI. COP'IIKITTEE REPORTS : No items. VII. NEW BUSINESS: No items. VIII. OLD BUSINESS: In reference to the Moen ..approval, LKr. Gorris reminded the members that the approval had stipulated that the sidewalks be extended from Moen up to the Apartments, even though part of the land ha,s not been developed. City.Engineer Deichmarm advised that there is an extensive punch list on the work in the right of way, and there is going to be a meeting to address these items. Regarding the smoke house ori Mastick, and-the Commission had.asked for a ruling from the Law Department. Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that the Law Director noted that it was unusual to ask for a special ruling on a residential property, however he sa.w no objection to it referred to Planning Cornission. 2