01/25/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

refer the Wal-Mart proposal, located on Brookpark Road to the Board of Zoning Appeals and since he believed that a variance should indicate a hardship, and he did not believed that there was a hardship indicated for the east setback, a ane hundred foot setback can be pLOVided with the commitment of this Planning Commission to take care of the parking requirements and to landbank that parking. However, the variance on the BLOOkpark Road side would bring it up with the Colebrook Condominitams and would not be negatine issue, and would maintain some continuity along the street and would not be a problem as long as the buffering in the area of the Colebrook Condominiums can be maintained and it would not affect the buffering along Brookpark Road. The Commission believed that the second variance which would be a 72.37 foot variance on the northern boundary line and would recommend that the Board of Zoning Appeals provide that variance and as part of the motion the Commission would recommend that the Board of Zoning Appeals not grant the variance on the east setback, seconded by B. Gorris. Roll call an mtion: Thomas, Gorris, Alston, Miller, 0'Rourke, and Tallon, yes. Mr. Orlowski, no. Motion carried. After the motion was made, Mr. Gorris questioned if mounding could be put within the Brookpark right of way. Mr. Conway stated that trees were installed on the Sun ToV./Office Maxx development in the right of way. Mr. Deichmann advised that O.D.O.T. would ha,ve the right to sa.y no. Mr. Dubelko stated that this would be a State issue, but generally he did advise the City against putting anything in the right of way if it involves transportation needs. Mr. Miller was still concerned that the Safety drive on the east side of building would not be paved and believed that the Commission owes it to the city and the adjacent residents to ask the developers at least to put in a stone base so the city does not loose a fire truck. Mr. Thomas explained that this is what would be required, an unpaved road would satisfy all the requirements of the Safety Department to a11ow a vehicle the size of a fire engine or other safety vehicles to go behind the building. He clarified that the road would have to be able to carry the weight of the fire equipment, but would still sustain grass on top. NEW DEVIIAPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS : No items. COP7MUNICATIONS : No items. COMNffTTEE REPORTS: No items. NEW BUSINESS: No items. OLD BUSINESS: No items. ADJOURNnn7ENT : The meeting was adjourned at 11:50 p.m. ?.. - B. Gorris, Chairman B Oring, erk of Commissions 14