My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/08/1994 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1994
>
1994 Planning Commission
>
02/08/1994 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:35 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 7:38:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1994
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/8/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
rezoning in any event. Rezoning may not make good sense, it may be-good planning, <br />but if that lot were rezoned to office, and if nobody could develop it <br />economically, the city will end up in court and a judge will decide. He noted <br />that he sensed the members frustration, but he believed the Commission has done <br />their job, but he also believed that Mr. Gareau is correct, the Commission should <br />not go forward without listening to anyone who has anything to say about the <br />economics of a rezoning. They can go ahead and do it, all he would ask for would <br />be a motion, and he would get a legislative sponsor. Mr. Thomas responded that <br />Mre Dubelko seemed to be implying that the Commi.ssion came up with this master <br />plan spontaneously and now they are trying to push it through, it took the <br />Commission two years of discussion to determine what they felt was appropriateo <br />Also he noted that N1r. Dubelko frequently asked that the Commission give him <br />something that he can defend in court. Never once during these discussions were <br />they provided guidance by the either the master planners of the County, the <br />people that they spoke to, or the administration regarding economic factors; <br />neither are economics mentioned in the zoning code. He did not think good <br />planning is based on the economics of a piece of property. Mr. Dubelko responded <br />that he told the members that, from a planning prospective they had done their <br />function correctly, he also told them that to defend a zoning classification in <br />court, he must avoid two pitfalls, first it must make sense from a planning <br />viewpoint, but even if that is the case, if a developer cannot develop it in that <br />zoning classification, the city will lose because everyone is entitled to get a <br />fair return on his investment. So if the Commission proposes to rezone the corner <br />of Dover and Lorain to office, it may make sense considering traffic concerns and <br />because it is a good buffer from the retail around it, but if a developer cannot <br />get a fair return on his investment, that zoning classification will be stricken <br />down. It would not have been practical during the study to have brought in <br />developers for every lot in town to see if rezoning it would be economically <br />viable since economics change and what might have been viable at the beginning of <br />the study, might not be at the end. He reiterated that the Conmiission did the <br />plan properly, but if Council or the.Administration did not agree to doing it <br />because of the economics at the time, they are not wrong; the plan is a guide or <br />a goal, but considering the economic climate, it may not be the time to implement <br />it. A1r. Orlowski stated that the Commission was entrusted to come up with the <br />ma.ster plan, and present it; the Commission was not looking at the economics of <br />it, that would enter into a court case during which they are going to look at the <br />exact economics of what is Ueing proposed and what avenues are left for them. All <br />that the Commission was entrusted to do was to put together a ma.ster plan and <br />present it and try to lobby for ways to have it approved. No one ever said it was <br />all going to be approved just because it was put together. Mr. Gorris stated that <br />no one expected it to be, but when the first two pieces of legislations are <br />stopped, the first one by the Law Director and the second by the by the Ma.yor, <br />the Commission could have Just bought a ream of paper, called it a master plan <br />and saved the city $50,000. He stated that he thought he was supposed to come up <br />with a plan for the city that night call for some rezonings and might call for <br />some tough decisions, so the Commission would not sit for 4 hour meetings with <br />people frustrated because the city is being over developed. If 4dal-Mart does not <br />locate at Dover and Lorain, there will be another retail development; it T:iight <br />not be 100,000 square ,foot, and it :night have circumvented the "big boa" <br />development, but it will be an intense use that will require huge expenditures to <br />work on the infrastructure. Now, if they have a document that says that this <br />parcel should be something else, then the city should have the fortitude to <br />implement it, and if the city has to fight it in court, it might be better to <br />spend money to fight it and save the city 4 to 6 million dollars in <br />infrastructure work. Mr. Orlowski agreed, but stated that they had done their <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.