Laserfiche WebLink
<br />initiated changes to the map, a procedure should be set up and a formal motion <br />should be required. A riotion was made to rezone the former Sherwin Williams <br />parcel and also on the parcels on the west end of town, but none wras made on the <br />last two. He has had several diseussion with Law Director Gareau and since North <br />O7msted has never had a ma.ster plan before, the Commission must go step by step. <br />Mr. Gareau believed that simply because the master plan was adopted, he does not <br />believe that Planning Commission should take every block of land that is not <br />zoned consistent with the master plan and attempt to rezone each parcel in the <br />city so that it is consistent with that plan. He believed that the master plan is <br />a guide, something that planners have loolced at from a planning perspective, but <br />it might not necessarily be economically feasible. For example, iMr. Gareau does <br />not believe it would make sense to rezone the lot on the corner of Dover Center <br />and Lorain (the Sherwin Williams parcel) to Office Building, it might have made <br />sense 5 years ago or perhaps five years in the future, but it does not make sense <br />presently due to market conditions. It mi.ght be feasible from a pure planning <br />perspective but, as he has pointed out in the past, a developer has to be able to <br />get a fair return on his investment. Again, a motion must be made before a <br />legislative request can be made, and Mr. Gareau does not want the Commission to <br />feel that they have to recomMend t:hat every lot has to be rezoned to the proposed <br />use. It is within the Planning Commission's authority to do it if they wish to. <br />Mr. Gorris responded that he remembered 15 or 16 years ago, Mr. Gareau telling <br />him that if he did not like something, the Planning Corrnnission coUld change it. <br />The Commission spent two years of their lives doing a master plan, and it is his <br />contention that everything should be rezoned according to that plan, if not the <br />Commission will continue to have 42 hour meetings with residents throwing barbs <br />at them; and the Council people will say that Mr. Gareau has stated that the <br />Planning Commission can protect the residents, so they should be able to do <br />something. This is the one thing that can be done to be effective and make a <br />change. He, personally, will try to do everything in his power to get lots <br />rezoned according to the master plan and if it does not produce the largest <br />economic return for the owners, that is not the Commission's problem. They were <br />supposed to make a ma.ster plan that was best for the citizens of North Olmsted, <br />not so the residents would have to spend 4 to 6 million tax dollars on infra- <br />structure repairs to line the pockets of some developer. This plan is supposed to <br />be for the good of the town and the residents. He believed that it is Mr. <br />Gareau's responsibility, since the Corrunission developed the plan in good faith <br />with the Law Department sitting in and telling them they were doing everything <br />properly, to defend an issue if it goes to court. Mr. Dubelko stated that he <br />wanted to get this out in the open since there has been some mi.s-conumuLication on <br />the part of a lot of people, and reiterated that he does not think that the <br />Commission has to recommend that every lot be rezoned immediately or within the <br />next 3 months just because they did a master plan; or, if Council does not <br />believe ichat it makes sense to rezone, that does not mean that either party has <br />not done his job. His opinion was that the Cor.?mission's function was to present a <br />plan that would be an ideal worl.d, but never was there any discussion about <br />economics of any piece of land, it was more or less a wish list as to what makes <br />sense from the city's viewpoint. No developer came forward and stated that he <br />could do this. He believed that there was a real problem between Council and <br />Planning Commission on this issue, as to whether one of them is doing sonething <br />wrong. The Commission has done it's job putting together a master plan, but that <br />does not mean Council has to rezone each parcel and neither does Planning <br />CoNffn.ission have to throw each proposed rezonings at Council and ask that they <br />either turn it down or approve it. If anyone stated that a proposed office <br />buildirg at Dover Center and Lorain does not make sense, the Commission should <br />not take the attitude that despite everything, they are going to recommend <br />8