My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/09/1994 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1994
>
1994 Planning Commission
>
05/09/1994 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:38 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 7:43:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1994
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/9/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />samples and the colored rendering of the building. Mr. Herbsman, the architect, gave another <br />presentatiou of the exterior materials on the bu.ild.ing since the neighbors had not been able to see <br />the renderings during the original one. Mr. Skoulis then asked about the possibility of damage to <br />Westbury's underground garage, Mr. Newberry had presented a cross section of this area <br />showing that they will be 8 to 9 feet away from the concrete slab, not the garage, which will be <br />over 20 feet away. Mr. Skoulis would like the mou.nd along Brookpark a little higher than the 6 <br />feet shown. Mr. Miller had asked Mr. Skoulis to be specific about the size of the mound that he <br />wanted, and Mr. Skoulis stated that it was hard to make a decision at this time. He would like <br />them to construct a sample of a 6, 7, and 8 foot mound so that the residents could see what they <br />preferred. Mr. Thomas believed that this would be economically impossible, and noted that the <br />A.R.B. had recommended a 4 foot mound, and the Commission had suggested 6 in deference to <br />the neighbors. He stated that Wal-Mart had a right to be seen from the main street. Mr. Gorris <br />clarified that tlus mound would also start at the elevation of the building floor. Mr. Thomas stated <br />that all the mounds should be taken from the same elevation. Mr. Conway had talked with Mr. <br />Zergott of the A.R.B. who would like to see entry way planting on Brookpark, since he is <br />concerned about the height of the mound on Brookpark. He suggested that some boulder or stone <br />work be used to tier the mound since so it will not look so high. Mr. Thomas believed that the <br />Commission could ask Mr. Zergott to follow through with this during construction. Mr. <br />Newberry believed that the height and width of the mound should be varied, in order to make it <br />more attractive and will talk to Mr. Zergott about the plans. Mr. Gorris noted that in his memo <br />of May 9th, Mr. Wendell, the forester, wanted some more parking spaces eliminated on the <br />southwest area in order to insure the existing trees survive. Mr. Thomas and Mr. Gorris were <br />concerned that if tlie Plauning Commission asked them to landbank those spaces, it would give <br />Wal-Mart an excuse to ask for variances to display in the parking lot. Mrs. Diver, Mitchell Drive, <br />would like the building to have more character, perhaps in, a Western Reserve style, and she <br />would also like the brick to come up higber. It was pointed out that Mr. Sohn had approved the <br />building. She asked Mr. Dubelko i? because they were allowed to build such a large store, and if <br />they denied a variance to display in the parking lot, oould they sue because they were denied the <br />right to sell. Mr. Dubelko advised that anyone could request a variance showing a practical <br />difficulty, and certainly the B.Z.A. would take into consideration that the hardship was self <br />imposed, but he cannot predict what either the B.Z.A. or the courts would do. Mrs. Schuler <br />stated that they appreciate that VVal-Mart did come back with these changes and they were <br />concerned when they read an article in the newspaper that pressure was being brought to bear on <br />the Planning Commission by the Mayor. Mr. Thomas and Mr. Gorris agreed that the Mayor had <br />never pressured the members of the Commission to vote any way for any proposal. She was also <br />advised that any outdoor display whether it is landscape material or the temporary greenhouse <br />would have to go before the Board of Zoning Appeals, because they do not have enough extra <br />parking spaces for outdoor display. Mrs. Schuler questioned if Wal-Mart could be asked to bear <br />the cost of traffic lights if more become necessary because of the _addition traffic they generate <br />and more are needed after the store is built. Mr. Dempsey agreed that more lights might be <br />needed and wou.ld like some kind of a contingency that they would have to pay for the lights. In <br />reference to the mound, since only 2 trees are to be saved by stopping the mound, he would <br />prefer that the mound and brick wall go all the way down the property line for safety and noise. <br />Mrs. Gerding, a resident of Chase Drive, explained that they live on the far eastern part of North <br />Olmsted and questioned what road would be used for emergency access, since she heard that they <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.