Laserfiche WebLink
..?t.. . ? " , <br />that the Commission has said or done can be undone by Council. He strongly suggested that the <br />residents attend those meetings. Mr. Thomas explained his vote. He agreed with the content of <br />the motion in principal which addresses the single access on Brookpark, mounding, buffers, and <br />restriction of storage; however, he believed that this development will have the greatest impact on <br />the city since the development of Great Northern Mall and the economic impact on the <br />community will be more than has been estimated, and that the development of the parcel to its <br />limits is both unwise and undesirable. He believed that the cost of the traffic control and the <br />maintenance of traffic flow is greater than the city is now estimating. He also believed that the <br />architecture of the building could be improved to include more brick according to the initial <br />recommendation of the Architectural Review Board, and he did not agree with the second <br />recommendation. For all of the above reasons he had voted no. After some discussion, it was <br />determined that there is to be a B.Z.D. Committee meeting ou May 1 lth, but there would not be <br />time to get the minutes to them or for the members to study the proposal that soon. <br />N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDNISIONS: <br />No items. <br />V. COMMUNICATIONS: <br />No items. <br />VI. COMIVIITTEE REPORTS: <br />No items. <br />VII. NEW BUSINESS: <br />No items. <br />VIII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />No items. <br />IX. ADJOURNMENT: <br />T'he meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m. <br />. <br />B. Gorris, ChairmaJn <br />B. Oring, <br />of Commissions <br />8