05/09/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..y .y iniuutes, tlus letter indicates that the owners of parcel "E" have no objection to the location of this drive as far as future development of parcel "E" is concerned. It is the Commission's uuderstanding that a mound will be maintained at an elevation of 8 feet above floor grade along the eastern property line, this will be a continuous mound to within 25 feet of Country Club Boulevard with the only break possible to save a clump of existing oak trees. On top of tlus mound there will be a brick wall ruuning the length of the wall and being stepped down .at the southern end to accommodate the.break in the mou.nd. Additionally, it t is recommended that a 6 foot mound along Brookpark be maintained, commencing at the east property line and continuing to the west end of the development with the only break in this mouud will be to permit access for the safety Department velucles wluch will be approximately 20 feet as indicated on the preliuiinary grading plan. Obviously the prel'vuinary grading plan does not show the westernmost drive eliminated from the proposal and the Commission will expect the mound to be carried all the way dowu there. We ask that Mr. Zergott involve.himself and make recommendations on both of these inounds as this plauuing process continues since we know he had certain concerns as to the drop off of the mound on Brookpark. We recommend that all lighting on the property be limited to 26 foot poles with all peripheral lights, with the exception of the main drive, being shielded lighting (iudicated by their fixture type "D"), such fixture is intended to retain the light on the parcel and to prevent light spill over on the property. The trash compactor will be insulated per the recommendations of the B.Z.A. and enclosed. It is our understanding that all trash generated by this business will be maintained within the building until it can be removed and all cardboard bales or pallets.will be maintained on the inside. It is also our understanding that the developer :. will bear the cost of the traffic signalization at the entrance on Brookpark and we would like the ::-Engineering Department to provide the B.Z.D. Committed of Council with a letter stating whether or not they have any concerns about the traffic signalization at Crreat Northern and this parcel, at Country Club and this parcel, and at Country Club,and Columbia. It is also noted that the mounding on the western property line near the Westbury Apartments will be 4.5 foot high as previously discussed with the A.R.B. There will be a 10 foot high by 60 foot long block wall that will be on the east side of the truck docks. The seasonal area will have a brick knee wall with brick columns or piers with the wrought iron steel fence in between the columns or piers. Wal- Mart is well aware that the truck unloading hours within our municipality are from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and we would like to restrict the use of the compactor to these same hours. Wal-Mart will be required to replace any trees that are killed or damaged in the course of construction or that should be discovered anytime there are as a result of the construction (the point being that it may not be discovered for 6 or 8 months after construction that tlie trees have died as a result of the construction). There should be a"Do Not Block Driveway Sign" placed on the east side of the driveway entrance to the Westbury Apartments and that all signage on the Wal-Mart proposal is restricted to the signage that was approved that limits what is actually to be allowed on the building and on the ground and pylon signs. The Coinmission would also like to send Mr. Wendell's comments relative to the landscaping and the deletion of the parking spaces on to the B.Z.D. but also to advise both the B.Z.D. and W. Wendell that by eliminating these parking spaces we will be giving approval to less than required parking which could be interpreted that we would be agreeing with outdoor display of landscaping materials on this site. The motion was seconded by L. Orlowski. Roll call on motion: Gorris, Orlowski, Alston, Miller, O'Rourke, and Tallou. Mr. Thoinas, no. Motion passed. Prior to the vote, Mr. Gorris advised the audience that tlus proposal will go ou to the B.Z.D. Committee of Council and then to Council, avd any thing 7