06/14/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

cars in the lot at that tune and she also noted that the State did allow day care centers in office buildings inany of wluch had restaurants which do serve alcohol. Mr. T'homas responded that he has uo problem with this proposal, but he does have a concern about the integrity of the shopping ceuter and how the other tenants will fulfill their agreements with the landlord and also if they will respect this property, the playground, the privacy and safety of the children. Mr. Orlowski noted that on the list ofhomeowners who favored this proposal, there was only one which backed up to the play area. He also advised that he had received a letter from Mr. J. Gruszka, 3965 Woodside Drive, who is opposed to anytlung taking place to the rear of the building. Mr. Thomas pointed out that Mr. Gruszka was north of Lauren Hill, and if he were east of Lauren Hill, he would be affected by tlus. Regard'uig the list of signatures of property owners, Ms. Wolf stated that the people who have a star beside their names live directly behind the property. She also stated that the school would accept cluldren at 18 months and there would be an after school program for cluldren up to 12 years old. W. Miller asked if the area where the children would be walking was level or rolliug. Ms. Rogers stated that it was level. Ms. Wolf advised that school buses wou'id pick up and drop off students at the center. Mr. Thomas asked if there were any ordinance requiring traffic to stop on private property when school buses are unloading for day care centers. Mr. Conway and Assistaut City Engineer McDermott were not aware of any. Mr. Thomas believed that the Commission should discuss traffic control on private property if day care centers will be going into areas with other businesses. Mr. Miller questioned if the day care center in the old Biyant Stratton building was ever required to get a conditional use permit. Mr. Couway stated that tlus would not affect this proposal. W. Garrish stated that he was a new employee of the management company, but he would be happy to discuss any issues of concem about the shopping center. J. Thomas moved to approve the day care facility called A Child's View, and request that the conditional use permit be provided to A Cluld's View at 24064 Lorain Road, contingent upon the approval of the Safety and Engineering Departments and ask that the developers take into consideration some kind of fence along the parking spaces between the mounding and the parking lot where they propose to march the children and wluch should extend all the way down to the entrance of the play ground. Also the Commission would ask that the Building Department pay special attention to the location of the dumpsters and also to provide Carnegie Mauagement with a list of items that have to be addressed or improved, not only in counection with A Child's View, but in connection with their original agreements with the city of North Olmsted. Also the Commission would like a review by the Director of Law of the specific ordinauce addressing the location of the playground, seconded by K. O'Rourke. Roll call on motion: Thomas, O'Rourke, and Orlowski, yes. Mr. Miller. Motion failed to pass. Mr. IVliller explained that he did not think it was a safe situation to put children close to garbage trucks, liquor and cars. Duriug the framing of the motion, Ms. Wolf asked if a 4 foot chain link fence would be sufficient. The members had no problem with that. It was clarified that no additional trees were to be removed, this plan was an original site plan from when the center was built. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if there would be any lighting installed in the play area. 1VIs. Wolf responded that they did not take the children out after dark. 2) Riui's Supermarket, 4700 Great Northern Boulevard. Proposal to add a vestibule and remodel store front elevation. 3