06/14/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

V. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDNISIONS: 1) Hetuiie Homes: Block "A" Lot Split. The proposal is to split block "A", ofthe recorded (volume 262 Page 50) Cinnamon Woods Dedicatiou Plat into tluee (3) residential lots. Location is the west side ofBarton Road abuttiug Olmsted Towuslup at the North Olmsted south corporate line, and abutting the east property line of Cuviainon Woods Development. Zoning is `B" Residence, Single, entirely, recently re-zoned by Ord. 93-155); two of the three proposed sublots conform to `B` Residence requirements for fi-ontage for a`B" residence zoue and will require referral to the Board of Zouing Appeals. Mr. Slagter, represented Hennie Homes, aud asked that the request be referred to the Board of Zoniug appeals. The members were familiar with this since they had requested that the property be rezoned. J. Thomas moved to refer the Hennie Hoines, Block "A" Lot Split the proposal to split block "A" ofthe recorded (volume 262 Page 50) Cinnamon Wood Dedication Plant into. (3) residential lots and to refer the nou-conforming lot to the Board of Zoning Appeals and recommend that they approve the request for variance, seconded by K. O'Rourke, and uuanimously approved. V. COMMUNICA'TIONS: Ord. 94-95. W. Thomas suggested that the review of the ordinance should be deferred until there is a larger attendance of the members. Mr. Orlowski agreed, but he would like some additional information. He wondered if the schedule iu Sectiou 1138.05 was going to be left in the new ordinance. Assistaut L,aw Director Dubellco advised that they noticed this today and they will be adding a new exlubit "A". Buildiug Cominissioner Conway advised Mr. Orlowski that the current zouing code for both the side and rear yards refers to Section 11137.07 and this is a complicated formula for figuring the setbacks from the property line. This is designed to give the Planning Commission more flexibility in dea]ing with these. Some side yard minimums have been stated because in most cases the development will be facing Lorain Road and abutting a similar use. The rear yard will be inaintained with more restrictive setback, but will give Planuing Commissiou more flexibility depending on the use in the rear. Mr. Orlowski asked if the 15 foot setback required for roof top units was to be deleted since it is not included. Mr. Conway will have to check into this. Nlr. Orlowski presented a memo requesting that when an ordinance is presented to the Plauning Commission, the changes should be lughlighted to make it more clear and also suggested that the original ordinance be on a separate page. He would like the whole process simplified. He preseuted a memo wluch is to be sent the Clerk of Council as a formal request. J. Thomas moved to table Ord. 94-95, secouded by K. O'Rourke, and unanimously approved. VI. CONIlVIITTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. NEW BUSINESS: No items. 6