Laserfiche WebLink
<br />that he could eliminate.some seating inside to compensate for the paxking. This <br />would be a seasonal use. Mr. Zergott stated tliat if he intended to do this he <br />should make an area with brick pavers and enclose it completely with landscaping <br />to prevent a child rtinning out into the drive-thru drive. Mr. Sohn stated that he <br />would like to see a drawing also. Mra Conway suggested that he draw plans which <br />could probably be submitted to Planning Comission as a minor change, but then it <br />would have to go to the Board of Zoning Appeals for a formal meeting. Mr. Conway <br />clarified that the members had no problem with the ground sign, even if it had to <br />be 5 by 5 feet square (if the cone cannot be set above the actual sign) that they <br />they perfer the sign on the awning, rather than a roof sign, and there is no <br />problem with the condensing imi.ts in back. He clarified that he doubted that the <br />roof sign would be permitted, and was sure it would have to have a variance. T. <br />Gallagher moved to approve for the Ice Cream Parlor, 27045 Lorain Road, the <br />awnings as shown., the encompassing of the air conditioners with a board on board <br />fence to match the building,and to approve the ground sign as shown, seconded by <br />B. Zergott, and unaniinously approved. <br />2) Your Typewriter Company, 29975 Lorain Road. <br />Temporary ground sign which owner would like to keep permanently. <br />Approved by Board of Zoning Appeals as a temporary sign an 2/3/93. <br />Mr. Fletcher, sign contractor, explained that they had a pernianent sign and a <br />temporary sign approved about 9 months ago. This is a new owner and he cannot <br />afford to get a permanent ground sign, and he would iike to keep what is there <br />• permanently. 'Ihe sign would still need a vaxiance for the location even if it is <br />approved as a permanent sign. Mr. Zergott believed that this sign looked like it <br />was temporary. Building Commissioner Conway stated that the board had been trying <br />to eliminate this type of sign throughout the city. He would like this policy to <br />be consistent, one way or -the other, because if this sign were approved, it would <br />be difficult to hold to higher standards with other businesses. They could apply <br />to the Board of Zoning Appeals for an extension. Mr. Zergott stated that if the <br />B.Z.A. extended the time it would be acceptable to him, however, this sign looks <br />too temporary to be on the property pennanently. He suggested that that they <br />could put it on some nice looking wood posts and frame it in, and then it might <br />be acceptable. Mr. Gallagher suggested?that he get the extension, and then return <br />to the board with some improved plans, and perhaps the members could -make some <br />suggestions. B. Zergott moved to disapprove making this sign a permanent sign,. <br />and suggest tha.t they go through tYre Board of Zoning Appeals to see what kind of <br />extension they can get, seconded by T.. Gallagher, and unanimously approved. <br />IV. OLD BUSINESS: <br />1) Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Property located an the south side of Brookpark Road. <br />Informal review of building materials submitted to Planning Conunission 4/9/94. <br />- (No representative will be present). <br />Heard later in the meeting. <br />2) Wendy's Restaurant, 26650 Lorain Road. <br />Informal review of landscape plan as requested at meeting of April 20th, and <br />subr,lission of finish materials list. (No representative will be present). <br />Heard la.ter in the meeting. <br />V. NEW BUSINESS: (Heard at this point.) <br />2