05/05/1994 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

would still be a garage space. It would not be in an enclosed room and the garage would have to be heated. Mr. Bouman was not sure his mother would agree to this. Mr. Gomersall advised that the board is opposed to loosing a two car garage, and suggested that the request be tabled until next month. Mr. Bower suggested enclosing a smaller area and reducing the garage space so it would accommodate a compact car. There would be a 14 foot space and a 6 foot deep room which would allow them to put heat into the room. The parking space in the garage would be almost 15 feet deep and there could be a 6 foot space deep enclosed area. Mr. Gomersall stated that this would be easier to convert back to garage area. Mr. Maloney also suggested that they could use sliding door for the washer and dryer. Mr. Conway stated that there would not have to be a rated door, but the appliances would have to be 6 or 8 inches off the floor. However this would not resolve the problem of heating the room. Mr. Conway advised that a ininimum parking space is 9 by 18 feet, so a 3 foot variance would be needed for the depth of the space. He would like it specified that the interior plumbing would still be installed. J. Maloney moved to grant the request to Shore West Construction Company, 246 Vista Circle, for a 3 foot variance on one half of a double garage to provide for a utility enclosure with the provision that the plumbing will be installed on the interior of the unit, seconded by R. Gomersall. Roll call on motion: Maloney, Gomersall, and Purper, yes. Mr. Koberna, no. Motion carried. Variance granted. Barbara L. Hwnphrey, 5640 Columbia Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 7 foot, 6 inch variance for location of fence in side yard (house faces Cary Lane) which extends adjacent to the required feont setback of the property on the abutting street. Violations of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135/02. Chaumau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Ms. Hwnphrey who explained that the fence is installed and is parallel to Columbia Road. She had removed some bushes and needed the privacy since that corner, of Columbia Road is heavily traveled. The members had no problem with the request. T. Koberna moved to grant the request of Barbara L. Humphrey, 5640 Columbia Road, for a 7 foot, 6 inch variance for location of fence in side yard (house faces Cary Lane) which extends adjacent to the requ.ired front setback of the property on the abutting street, seconded by W. Purper, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 6. Boston Chicken, 26440 Lorain Road. Request for variances. (1123.12). Request 10 foot variance for landscape buffer on east and west property lines. Request 10 foot rear yard variance for landscape buffer on north property line. Request variance for width and area of lot (change of use). Violations of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1139.07, and 1139.06. Also request variance to place free standing sign in prohibited triangular area. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12(b). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. S. Krekus, representing P. & L. Food Service. Mr. Krekus stated that there were buildings on 3 sides of this property. Mr. Gomersall believed that this was the wrong location for a restaurant and did not believe that this property would support one. Mr. Krekus stated that they had looked at other parcels and this was the only one available. Mr. Koberna noted that the new codes were an attempt to make Lorain Road look a bit better and he, too, would have a hard time supporting 4