Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />specified by the city, they are also proposing a gated off, emergency ingress to the site fi-om <br />Woodview Drive. T'he average home price is about $120,000. wluch would generate about <br />$187,000. in taxes per year and these owners would use few of the city services, considering that <br />tliey are mostly empty uesters. At present this site has about 6.65 acres of land zoned for <br />cominercial use wluch they intend to reduce to 4.17 acres thus reducing commercial floor area <br />fi-om 72,500 to 45,400 square feet. Mr. Tallon noted that there were no sidewalks planned. Mr. <br />Basalla respouded that some of the communities have no sidewalks, but they would be willing to <br />put in sidewalks on one side of the street, but sidewalks one two sides of the street would be <br />»n„ecessaiy. Mr. Tallon disagreed stating that this type of community is close knit and residents <br />should not have to walk in the street, there should be sidewalks ou both sides of the street as well <br />as pedestriau access to Lorain Road. In response to Mr. Miller's questions, Mr. Basalla clarified <br />that in computiug the density of the surrounding area, he had taken the figures from the <br />centerline of the roads, that he had to figured in the property on both sides of the street in their <br />development he had used the entire street, but if he had considered the property across the street <br />ou the adjaceut streets, he would have use the entire street; and that he had also included the <br />pouds in the density. He doubted that there would be much silt build up in the ponds, since they <br />were not ou active streams and the ponds could be aerated. In reference to fencing around the <br />ponds, he believed that feucing in the development should be sufficieut, but thought that some <br />kiud of landscaping could be used iu lieu of a fence. Mr. Whitlatch advised that his residents <br />enjoyed watclung the water and feeding the ducks, and a fence would detract from that. He noted <br />that these ponds would be owned by the commwuty which would assume the liability and would <br />also have the responsibility of maintauung them. He believed that the lakes and the landscaping <br />around them adds to the value of the homes and a fence would take away from that. They will <br />inake a safe shoreline with flat edges or landscape the steeper slopes with a thorned t}pe <br />vegetation. The pouds are 12 feet deep at the deepest point and about 3 feet deep at the <br />shoreline. Eveu though the area is fenced in there will be no guardhouse but there will be a <br />pedestrian walk way onto Woodview. The members believed that unfenced ponds might pose a <br />hazard. Mr. Basalla advised that the emergency access and gate was at the city's request. Mr. <br />Tallon stated that, if these ponds are allowed, he would ask that the developer return with a <br />proposal showing, in detail, elevations, topography, landscaping and protective devices that are <br />going to be used, whether manmade or natural. He advised that the city normally wanted the <br />retention underground. In reference to the type of residents, he explained that less than 5% have <br />had more than two people in a household; approximately 20% of the residents will be younger, <br />double income couples; about 50 to 65% are empty nesters. There are no one bedroom units, the <br />2 bedroom/2 bath units normally have a loft and all units have a 2 car garage. The least expensive <br />unit will be 110,000 to 112,000 and that could go up to 165,000 depending ou the options. Mr. <br />Basalla clarified that the storage area of the ponds would be in the sloped areas. The sauitary <br />sewer system plans have been submitted, aud City Engineer Deiclunaun is requesting a holding <br />facility, which they would agree to. In reference to the Fire Department report, Building <br />Commissioner Conway advised that the Fire Department stated that the roads must meet the <br />ordinance, but did not specifically state that they did and he would request clarification from <br />them. He clarified that the floor area did not comply to the code, and that there was some areas <br />where the setback did not comply which the Planning Commission could address, the lack of a <br />fence around the ponds would have to be addressed by the Board of Building Code Appeals. He <br />noted that the setback next the vacant parcel was 35 feet, not 50 as required. Mr. Basalla <br />responded that tlus could be adjusted. He further advised that they have a contract to purchase <br />the property, not an option. In reference to statements made in their brochure regarding the <br />variances that are being requested, Mr. Miller asked what the unusual conditions of the <br />5