My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/10/1995 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1995
>
1995 Planning Commission
>
01/10/1995 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:52 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 8:26:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1995
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/10/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />iustall lighting, but there is none in their neighborhood. She, too, has had water problems ever <br />since Clague Tower's condominiums were constructed. She maintained that they have had water <br />problems for 25 years and these should be addressed before more building is allowed. She does <br />not believe that any resident would be against the property being developed as zoned. She does <br />not believe that the residents need to see a fence and a gate and why should needed another <br />access road when one access is all that their development has ever had. She further objected to <br />the traffic, the difficulty of getting out of Sharon Drive onto because of the traffic congestion on <br />Clague Road. She asked that the Commission that the consider the residents who were told that <br />this would be developed far single family homes. Dr. Cohut believed that the developer has <br />presented a convoluted argument as to what size the units will be, and basically they want the <br />inaximum number of dollars to a minnnum number of square feet. Mrs. R. Wingenfeld, a 25 year <br />resident who lives elsewhere in North Olmsted, spoke in favor of the project explaining that she <br />and her husband would like to sell their 5 bedroom home, and buy a larger home but remain in <br />North Olmsted. It was explained to her that this property was zoned Single Family "C", <br />Residence, and would have to be rezoned. She stated that if Single Family homes were built it <br />would generate more children for the school system and more traffic in the area. In response to <br />the neighbors' negative comments (from the floor) she stated that she was not a retiree, she was <br />an active employee and intended to work for some time but she did not want to maintain a large <br />home. She noted that they had paid taxes for all these years and would to remain here. She <br />maintained that she had several friends who were interested in this type development but they did <br />not atteud, since usually only people who were against a proposal attended the meetings. She <br />also told the residents that she considered this a residential development and concluded that there <br />was a need for this type housing for empty nesters. Mr. Hicky complained about flooding <br />problems he has had far 18 years which were caused by Clague Towers noting that he had <br />removed his family room carpeting seven times. He asked that their properties be protected. He <br />was aware that they would lose the woods someday, but did not want it to give them up for 89 <br />cluster homes, and objected to having 3 houses in a row with a fence, he might agree to 2 units <br />that were more spread out with at least 2,000 square feet. He maintained that this area could not <br />handle what they had. He stated that he, too, might move to a cluster home, but not one this <br />dense. Mr. Belsey realized that the woods would be sold some day, but objected to developers <br />asking for variances, since the codes were written to protect the citizens. Especially developers <br />who did not live in the city, and asked that the city listen to the people who lived in the city. He <br />also suggested that the developers sign a contract agreeing to clean up the silt if it builds up in <br />the retention system. He objected to the building that was going on and stated that it had to stop. <br />He will move if the bridge is installed to Woodview, because he is sure it will Ue opened up when <br />these residents cannot get out on Lorain. Councilmau D. Lind advised that he had visited several <br />of Whitlatch's communities and believed that they were well developed, however, he agreed that <br />any proposed development on tlus property should be limited to single family homes as zoned. <br />He, too, would like the property to remain natural, but noted that an ovvner had a right to <br />develop his property. He stated that it is incumbent on this panel to insure that any development <br />is properly carried out. He stated that the issue of storm water retention is pressing, and the 10% <br />reduction in the run off is not nearly enough. He believed that further development in this area <br />should be restricted until the entire drainage system is corrected in the northeast qnadrant of <br />North Olmsted. He urged the Commission to deny the request for rezoning. A 48 year resident of <br />West 231, who did not give his name, complained that all the water from ]Lorain Road came <br />down his street and the water from the parking lot empties into this property. He also advised <br />that, because of the quick sand in the area, some of the casings for the storm sewers had been <br />lost when the sewers were put in. Another resident of West 231st. Street speculated that i? as <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.