My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/14/1995 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1995
>
1995 Planning Commission
>
02/14/1995 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:53 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 8:27:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1995
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/14/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />line, tlien shifting to a split rail fence that will meander through the wooded area and this will be <br />pulled into their side of the property which would give the appearance of the woods being on the <br />adjacent property. Additionally, they are proposing an inner cordon fence around the primary <br />water features which attaches to the building envelope to create a barrier to the water features. <br />They believe that open water retention is the most superior way of controlling water retention. <br />Mr. Mitchell, landscape architect, explained that, as a secondary safety precaution around the <br />ponds, they have included in some areas, very gradual slopes ending in a large 8 to 12 foot wide <br />safety shelf, only 18 inches cieep, so that if someone did fall in they could stand up; in the steeper <br />areas they will include landscaping with plant material like shrub roses and hawthorns, which are <br />hard to get through so that the only access would be to the very gradual slopes. These ponds are <br />all visible from the rear of the houses. Mr. Basalla clarified that they will be planting evergreen <br />trees on outside edge of the fence to screen it from view of the neighbors. He stated that, at the <br />meeting of the residents, it was specified that they did not want more flooding, neither storm nor <br />sanitary. He had previously stated that the pond system would reduce the flow by 33%, but it will <br />be more than that and these statistics have been forwarded to th'e Engineering Department. He <br />believed that they would be reducing the existing problems. W. Dargas, engineer, explained what <br />has been proposed to reduce these problems. In reference to the sanitary sewer, they are proposing <br />a two stage detention system, the first stage being at the site discharge point where they will <br />control the discharge coming out of the site to detain the additional flow somewhat. Customarily <br />they design for peak flow of 400 gallons per day (gpm) for each.unit, after the system is in place, <br />it will hold back the discharge for two hours; also to help the system out, they have proposed a <br />second stage of detention by installing 200 linear feet of 30 inch pipe toward the end of Sharon <br />Drive where it discharges into Clague Road which will store more sanitary flow until the peak flow <br />has passed through Clague Road before discharging back into the system In reference to the <br />siltation issue, Mr. Basalla advised that there is a letter from the engineering company indicating <br />that of the various means of water retention, the one the least impacted by siltation would be an <br />open design since the discharge point for retention is at the top of the water, not the bottom. <br />Regarding hazardous waste, the EPA has given them a clean bill of health after a study was <br />presented by an environinental consulting firm. In reference to the wetlands, they have analyzed <br />the soil conversation maps and the wetland delineation drawings and there is no indication of <br />wetlands on this property. They also strongly believe that the storm water management system that <br />they are proposing could not be replicated in a single family development, since the land would <br />have to be divided into individual lots and there is little room to do any significant r.etention. In a <br />cluster community, the residents do not use their back yards, they mainly want a view that is <br />beautiful, not a swing set. He further maintained that this is a single family commu.nity wherein the <br />residents, most likely residents from North Olmsted, will own their units and pay taxes on them. <br />This community will be compatible with the adjacent single family developments. He believed that <br />both the community and the small public works project that they are proposing will be valuable to <br />the city. He stated that the master plan had specified that the site be rezoned to the Mixed Use "D" <br />district which would allow for a variety of uses, including elderly housing at 40 units per acre, <br />garden apartments at 15 units per acre, and single family cluster at 6 units per acre and they are <br />proposing a lower density than that. Mr. Whitlatch advised that they are willing to commit to these <br />proposals in writing and offer a two year warrantee on each unit. They want to work with the <br />adjacent residents. He noted that today's new zoning for planned development or cluster <br />development is considered single family housing. . They do not consider this a different typ e of use, <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.