09/26/1995 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

L Mr. Brokaw agreed that they could leave the existing driveway open, but it would not allow for direct access into the easterly parking lot. The members agreed that the existing drive would cause less congestion. A variance on oue or two parkuig spaces would be needed, but the developers agreed that these could be elunuiated. Since there are several lots involved and a portion of the property is zoned "A" Residential with the balance being General Retail, the developers would like to have the lots consolidated and rezoned at the same time. Building Commissioner Conway advised that this project would require a special permit since the old buildiug is not set back 75 feet. Mr. Brokaw explained that the retention system would hold back the water which eveutually would run into the ditch in the rear. Mr. Deichmann advised that no retention plans have been submitted as yet. Mrs. Thomas, a resident, was concemed about the stonn water which drains into the ditch directly behind her house since there has been some flooding. Mr. Tallon explained that the retention system would have to meet the requirements of the city. Mrs. Thomas stated that the church was originally supposed to put retention basins beluud her property, but it was installed beside Barton Road so the ditch is still there and has not been cleaned out for years. Mr. Brokaw advised that they did not intend to make the flooding situation worse, and if they can get perinission, they would agree to clean out the ditch while their equipment is ou the site. R. Tallon moved to refer the Christ The King proposal to the board of zoning appeals with the recoimnendation that the special permit lie approved but would like the board to base its approval on the removal of the two parking spaces on the southeast corner of the property and on leaving the existing entrance on Lorain Road open and closing the proposed entrance. The commission also requests that the traffic engineer look at the driveway situation, taking into consideratiou the soccer fields, the planued senior residential complex in this area, as well the growth that is expected in the future and that he forward lus recommendations to the board of zoning appeals. The motiou was secouded by T. Brenuan, and uuavimously approved. N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDNISIONS: 1) Fortney and Weygandt Lot Consolidation Plat. The proposal is to coinbiue Permaneut Parcel Nos. 233-6-11 and 233-6-15 into one (1) parcel, wluch is the site of the proposed Fortney & Weygandt Office Building. Location is the south side of Bradley Road, west of Wild Oak Drive. Zoning is Limited Iudustry-Industrial Park District, entirely. Tabled at meeting of September 12, 1995. Mr. McBride, represeutiug Fortney and Weygaudt, advised that they have been issued permits from Building and Engineering based ou approval of the lot consolidation. The members had no problems with the consolidation. No residents were present. R. Koeth moved that the Fortney and Weygandt Lot Consolidation Plat be approved, the proposal is to combine Permanent Parcel Nos. 233-6-11 and 233- 6-15 into one (1) parcel, wluch is the site of the proposed Fortney and Weygandt Office Building. The location is the south side of Bradley Road, west of Wild Oak Drive. Zoning is Limited Industry- Industrial Park District, eutu•ely. The motion was seconded by K. O'Rourke and uuauunously approved. 2) Bridgeport Village Subdivision (No. 2) for Wlutlatch and Co., Preluninary Plau. The proposal is to subdivide Perinanent Parcel No. 231-11-43, located to the uorth and west of the Maple Ridge Road/West 231 Street intersection aud adjacent to the Resideutial portion of the previously approved (Preliminary Plau, only). Bridgeport Village (Whitlatch) Subdivision, into seven (7) resideutial lots plus a proposed pond area, and iucludes the west extension and dedication of Maple Ridge Road. Zouing is C-Residence Siugle, entirely. Continued from meeting of September 12, 1995. Note: corrected plat subuiitted. 2