03/29/1995 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

_---?-- - --r - ? ..• ,•? Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d)(5). Note: house is non-conforming and houses on side street have non-conforming front setbacks. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was adininistered to Mr. Wade. Mr. Koberna questioned the drawing and Mr. Wade explained that the deck would come out 8 foot from the house. Mr. Gomersall stated that the deck will not be visible from the property next door since that property is adjacent to the Wade's garage. For that reason, the members had no problem with the request. Since the house is non-conforming, Mr. Gomersall asked if a special permit were not required. Building Commissioner Conway advised that a special permit should be added to the request. R. Gomersall moved to grant the request to Christopher and Michelle Wade, 3338 Clague Road, a 41 foot variance to construct deck in rear of comer lot dwelling which will be abutting the front setback of the adjacent house on the side street. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d)(5). Also to grant a special permit to add to a non-conforming house on a side street having a non front set back. Specialpermission required Ord. 90-125 Section 1165.02(b)(1). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney, and unauimously approved. Variance granted. 10. Scott Sei , 6369 Somerset Dr. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 28 foot setback variance to install 6 foot fence in rear yard of corner lot adjacent to property with a 50 foot setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 113 5.02(f-2) Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Seiglunan. Mr. Gomersall questioned why he needed a 6 foot fence since it was adjacent to the house next door. Mr. Seighman responded that he would agree to a lower fence but clarified he preferred a wood fence. He advised that the fence would be 3 feet offthe sidewalk. The members agreed that this would be dangerous because it would hinder visibility. M.T. Maloney suggested that he should ruu the fence even with the house to his neighbors property. Mr. Seighmau agreed to this and also agreed to a four foot fence. J. Maloney moved to grant the request of Scott Seiglunan, 6369 Somerset Drive, for a setback fence to install a 4 foot fence in the rear yard of a corner lot adjacent to property with a 50 foot setback. This fence is to commence at the eastern comer of the house, and will continue east to the rear property marker. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(f-2). The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanunously approved. Variance granted. Building Commissioner Conway verified that the intent was to install the fence parallel to the sidewalk and maintain the distance between the sidewalk and the house. 11. Pearl Vision, Inc., 26103 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to have temporary banner for "Grand Re-Opening". Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.12(g) and 1163.04(g). Chauman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was admuustered to Mr. White, representing Pearl Vision. He clarified that the banner would be approximately 20 foot by 4 foot and would be located on the front above the door. They are requesting it for one week, from Saturday, April 8th through and including Saturday, April 15th. Mr. White also asked if they could place a small coca cola truck in the parking lot on April 8th. He advised Building Commissioner Conway that they had a double row of parking and wanted to place it in the row next to the street. Mr. Conway stated that a variance would be needed for conducting business in the front setback even 5