Laserfiche WebLink
<br />be stipulated that if a variauce is inodified, the applicant should subinit a revised drawiug that accurately <br />reflects what was chauged. <br />Also, a letter from a Mr. Mackie had been sent objecting to the a variances being granted when he was <br />not uotified. The city records had uot been updated, however the couuty did show he aud his wife as the <br />owners. Law D'u•ector Gareau asked the copies of the city's records be sent to lwn and he will respond to <br />Mr. Mackie. <br />Building Coinmissioner Conway advised that a sigu submitted by Office Max/Copy Max has been <br />iustalled and now has a logo (a computer mouse) under the graplucs, nothing in the minutes reflected a <br />logo and none of the meinbers saw a rendering with one. Mr. Gomersall noted that one of the signs had <br />been installed and there was no logo. Nonnally a logo is presented to the architectural review board for their comments, and the board would not have approved it without referring it to them. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m- <br />R. Gomersall, Chairman <br />B. Oring, Clerk of Commissions <br />8