08/31/1995 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r ? Chairman Goinersall called all iuterested parties before the board. The oath was admuustered to Mr. DeAngelis, manager of BP and Ms. McBride, sigu contractor, who explained that they want to remove the existing pole sigu that is now on Brookpark Road aud put in a grou.nd level sign at the driveway on Great Northern Boulevard siuce there is uo drive on Brookpark Road. T7iey are in the process of discussing the lease with the laudlord, and if they decide to renew it, they will get permission from the owner before installing the sigu. However, they do have an identity 'problem at this location. Building Commissioner Conway clarified that tlus was the second free staudiug sign because someone else's sign is on that property and that the variauce for the square footage takes all the signs into consideration. He is concemed that there might be a visibility problem, and he would like it moved back. It was determined that the sigu should be 10 to 12 feet back froin the riglit of way which usually starts 1 foot from the sidewalk. Mr. Conway advised that the board has granted variances for this shopping center on other occasions, but they have always wanted the owner to come in with a coordinated sign program; and since the expuation date to reusove pole sigus is getting closer, the board might have some leverage now, because this business is thinking about not sigviug a lease. It was determined that their drive was the first driveway north of the two drives for the Kuby Seivice Building or the tlurd drive north of Brookpark Road. Mr. Couway requested that they submit a correct site plan. R. Gomersall moved to grant the request of BP Procare, 4710 Great Northern Boulevard for an agreed modified variance to replace the existing pole sign with a free standing grouud sigu for an individual teuant in a inulti-unit complex; a variauce to have a second fiee standiug sigu on the property, this BP Procare sign is to be located 10 foot fi-om the right of way by the tlurd drive uortli of Brookpark Road. Also to grant a 10.5 square foot variance for excess business unit sigvage; a 2 foot height variance for proposed ground sign and a location variance for a grouud sigu wlvch is to be placed in the restricted triangle formed by the iutersection of driveway and fi•ont property liue. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.12(h); 1163.12(b); 1163.11(c); and 1163.12(b) subject to the approval of the property owners. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna, and uuanimously approved. Variances granted. ' 14. David P. Walker, 4085 Saw Mill Cu-cle. Reyuest for variance (1123). 12). Request 20 square foot variance for area of shed which exceeds maximum_ 2% of rear yard area. Please Note: height of shed is not stipulated. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(D)(1). Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Walker and Mr. Kovalac, builder. It had beeu detennined before the meeting that the shed would be 10 feet high and would covfonn to code. The meinbers had no problem with the request. J. Maloney moved to grant the request of David P. Walker, 4085 Saw Mill Circle, for a 20 square foot variance for area of shed wluch exceeds maxamum 2% of the rear yard area. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(D)(1). The inotion was seconded by M. Boyle, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 15. Ameritech, 25907 Crreat Northeiu Plaza. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to use search light. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.14(g). This request was heard at the beguuuug of the meeting Chainnan Gomersall stated that it has been suggested, in reference to the Samu- Ewida case (7), that a revised site plau be submitted. Building Commissioner Conway believed that from uow ou out it should 7