07/27/1995 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, ` + Y sign and a 5 square foot variance of excess business use signage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.12(A) and 1163.11(A). The motion was seconded by M. Boyle, and unauimously approved. Variances granted. 6. Ronald Sperhac, 5873 Louis Drive. Request for variance (1123.12). Request to have two additional sheds on property. Also request 144 square feet variance for area of shed over the 2% maximum allowed. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 113 5.02(d)(1). Chau-mau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. and Mrs. Sperhac. Mr. Gomersall noted that they had three sheds. Mr. Maloney stated because of their location with 1480 rnnning across the back, they were not a problem. Mr. Gomersall stated that there would be a problem at most locations. Mrs. Sperhac preseuted two letters from neighbors, one across the street who looks right at the shed aud the other froin the neiglibor on the west, neither of whom had an objection. T. Koberua moved to grant the request of Ronald Sperhac at 5873 Louis Drive for a variance to have two additional sheds on lus property and a 144 square foot variance for area of shed over the 2% maximum allowed. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sectiou 1135.02(d)(1). T7ie motion was seconded by W. Puiper, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 7. Beth Scebbi, 3588 Clague Road. Request for variauce (1123.12). Request variance to install fence 18 feet into the required 25 foot side setback and 50 foot into the front setback ofthe abutting lot on the side street. Also request 4 foot side yard variance for deck Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(d)(fl and 1135.02(d)(4). Chainnan Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was admiuistered to Ms. Scebbi. It was clarified that the request is for a 6 foot high fence wluch was not mentioned in the write up. Mr. Gomersall had no problem with tlus because of the apartments and it was noted that the fence was far enough back that there would be no visibility problems. R. Gomersall moved to graut the request of Beth Scebbi, 3588 Clague Road to install a 6 foot feuce, 18 feet into the required 25 foot side setback and 50 foot into the front setback of the abuttiug lot on the side street. Also to grant a 4 foot side yard variance for a deck. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sectious 1135.02(d)(fl and 1135.02(d)(4). It was clarified for Ms. Scebbi that even though she owns 150 feet beyond the fence, it still abuts the neighbors front yard. The motion was seconded by M. Boyle, and uuauimously approved. Variances granted. 8. Nuevo Acapulco/ Roberto Ramirez, 24409 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance for second wall sign (attractive device, Section 1163.04G). Request 6 foot 1.5 iuch height variance for sigu; request 69 square foot variance for excess sign area over that permitted for a wall sign; request 84.5 square foot variance for excess sign area permitted for a business building; aud request 118.5 square foot variance for excess total business use signage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Sections 1163.12 (A); 1163.11(B) and (A). Chairman Gomersall called all iuterested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Ms. Marquez, representing the owner. Mr. Gomersall read the request and stated that the sign is pretty and he has no objection to it other thau it will set a precedent and there will be murals all over the city. He noted that what is pretty and uice to one person is objectionable to someone else. Mr. Kobema believed that each mural should be taken on its own merits. Ms. Boyle agreed noting that it was just a blank wall before, but the paint is peeling now. Ms. Marquez stated that it will be attractive after it is finished and noted that there is no name on it.. 1VIr. 1Vlaloney would like the Law Director's opuuon ou murals. Building Commissioner 4