My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/12/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission
>
03/12/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:13 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 8:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` t" <br />23379 Sharon Drive <br />North Olmsted, OH 44070 <br />March 11, 1996 <br />Dear Planning Commission Members, <br />You are to be commended for your admirable efforts in addressing the many delicate <br />issues surrounding the Bridgeport Development. Your genuine concern for the residents, <br />both existing and potential, is appreciated. <br />As a registered civil engineer in the State of Ohio who has spent his career designing <br />wastewater treatment and conveyance systems, I need to express my genuine concern <br />over Bridgeport Development. In particular, I believe that the retention basin is seriously <br />undersized. I do not have access to all the engineering data and drawings. However, I <br />was able to examine two drawings in the current Western Reserve drawing set, and have <br />made a few engineering calculations. <br />Suppose you had the following conditions_ Assume Rice Ditch is completely dry (it <br />almost never is). Assume further that a sudden, heavy storm began, and all the pipes <br />leading into and out of the storm water retention basin were instantly to flow full under <br />the force of gravity. Under these circumstances, the storm water retention basin would <br />fill in about 50 minutes. <br />How likely is it that basin is undersized? In my professional opinion, very likely, since <br />the data used to size the basin is out-of-date. According to the Climate Analysis Center, <br />the National Weather Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, <br />and the U.S. Department of Commerce, the rainfall data presented in North Olmsted's <br />"Storm Water Management and Urban Sediment Pollution Abatement Systems" under- <br />predicts rainfall amount by up to 25%. Thus, the 10% safety factor built into the North <br />Olmsted code still falls as much as 15% shy of where these Federal Agencies say it <br />should be. <br />Also, I used a digital planimeter to calculate the volume that this basin can store. My <br />calculations show that the effective volume of the basin is roughly 318,000 cubic feet. <br />The last time I heard about this issue, the volume of the storm water retention basin was <br />414,000 cubic feet_ According to my calculations, the size of the basin as shown on the <br />Western Reserve drawings is about 30°/a less than what was expected. <br />How often will this basin flood? This is difficult to predict accurately. Based on the <br />most recent information rainfall data available, and using the more conservative numbers <br />above, this basin is estimated to flood out once every twenty-five years or so.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.