My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/26/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission
>
03/26/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:13 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 8:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/26/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4) Biskind Development Company, <br />Amendment to a preliminary land use plan proposing a hotel (Studio Plus) at Great Northern <br />Technology Park, to be located on the south side of Country Club Boulevard, east of Victoria Plaza <br />Apartments. <br />Referred by council March 5, 1995. <br />Mr. Corsi, representing the owner of the property, presented the preliminary plan and conected the <br />agenda write up which refened to the proposed development as a motel, it should have read hotel. He <br />explained that Studio Plus is an extended stay motel and would be comparable to a Residence Inn, but <br />not with all the amenities, since it is geared to a medium cost long term stay. Considering that there is <br />another hotel proposed, Mr. Brennan questioned if there was a need for a fourth hotel. Mr. Corsi stated <br />that their company did not do the demograplucs, but the industry wide information is that hotel capacity <br />is up and growing. This facility will have 72 rooms. Mr. Herbster noted that he had originally proposed <br />another hotel next to the Courtyard. Mr. Corsi responded that there are no plans for that at this time, <br />they are only asking for this one. Building Commissioner Conway reminded the commission that when <br />the Marriott land use plan was submitted, the members had asked for some demographics to establish a <br />need. This should be of interest for either property. Mr. Brennan is concerned that if two more hotels <br />are built, occupancy rate of the existing hotels will go down and instead of a high class hotel, this area <br />could become another Lorain Road in Fairview Park. Mr. Corsi advised that the existing hotels have an <br />85 percent or better occupancy rate which is extremely high for the hotel industry. It has been quoted <br />in the Urban Land Institute that occupaucies have been at 65.5 percent or better in the hotel industry in <br />general and they expect higher occupancy in the next two years. Mr. Brennan noted that this is <br />nationwide, and he does not see the need in North Olmsted. Mr. Corsi responded that the need is <br />determined by the user, who would not make such an investment without understanding what the <br />market would be. This facility is for extended stays, and is unlike any other hotel in North Olmsted. He <br />advised that the Technology Park office buildings are not fully occupied. Mr. Mauving pointed out that <br />there is a rush to build hotels in downtown Cleveland to fill this need, but when there is a glut of hotels <br />downtown, it could make a problem in North Olmsted because this area might not be of interest. He <br />noted that the developer had asked for another hotel next to the Marriott, but it was not approved, and <br />he is concemed that, later when there will be a demand for office space, the city would be stuck with <br />hotels. He believed that the need for hotels is being satisfied. Mr. Corsi believed that this same argument <br />could be used against building office bu.ildings. Mr. Brennan stated that the same things that make this <br />area attractive to hotels, would make it attractive to corporate headquarters. He believed that hotel jobs <br />were basically minimum wage, an office would give the city a better return and would have a lower <br />impact, less petty crime,. stolen cars, etc. Mr. Corsi stated that there was an article in the Westlife <br />quoting the Finance Director as stating. that a hotel would result in $30,000. to 40,000 in revenue and <br />that would be the tax equivalent in income taxes from an office with 50 employees each earning <br />$30,000, or a million and a half dollar payroll; and that did not include the°income tax contributed by the <br />enaployees. The impact on the public facilities and services would be minimaL Chairmau Tallon <br />reminded Mr. Corsi that the commission had asked that the next time he presented a proposal that he <br />submit information on all the developed land that is owned by his company in the Mixed Use District. <br />Mr. Corsi thought that they just wanted a site plan showing all the land in parcel `B" and all the drives <br />in that affect that area. Mr. Tallon responded that the request was for all of the Mixed Use land. He <br />asked that the developers of the hotel come to the ne3ct meeting and share the demographics, the need <br />for the development, what its future is; and why they feel that this is a good area for it; and, at the same <br />time, he would like to see the plan of all their Mixed Use land. A member of the auclience asked them to <br />explain what the hotel was like, but was advised that this is merely the preliminary land use plan, the <br />building proposal will be discussed later. Mr. Conway advised that the preliminary land use plan had to <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.