05/28/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CTTY OF NORTH OLMSTED PLANNING COMMISSION MIINLJTES - MAY 28, 1996 I. ROLL CALL: Chairmau Tallon called the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. Present: T. Brennan, T. Herbster, R. Koeth, A. Mauning, K O'Rourke, and R. Tallon. Absent: D. Cameron Alston. Also Present: Assistant Law Director Dubelko, City Engineer Deichmann, Building Commissioner Conway, Clerk of Commissions Oring, and Assistant Clerk of Commissions Cornish. II. REVEEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: Chairman Tallon advised that since a motion had been left out of the Apri19, 1996 minutes they had to be amended. T. Brennan moved to approve the minutes of Apri19, 1996, as amended, seconded by K O'Rourke. Roll call on motion: T. Brennan, K O'Rourke, T. Herbster, A. Manniug, and R. Tallon, yes. Mr. Koeth abstained. R. Tallon moved to accept the minutes May 14, 1996 as presented, seconded by T. Herbster. Roll call on motion: R. Tallon, T. Herbster, T. Brennan, A. Manning and K O'Rourke, yes. Mr. Koeth abstained. III. BUII.,DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: 1) Great Northem Dodge, Project number 2, 26100 Lorain Road. Proposal to construct new build.ing and revision to site plan and drainage. Properties should be combined. Continued by plauuing commission on May 14, 1996. Mr. Shartman, owner, and Mr. Burke, engineer, presented revised plans. Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that there is nothing to prohibit the assembly of properties with two different owners. There could be a problem for the owners, but that would not be a concern of the city. They do have to assemble it, because they cannot build across property lines. Mr. Shartman advised that they would eliminate that building. Build.ing Commissioner Conway advised that the site plan that was just presented still did not reflect everything that was on the property; the unloading zone and the dumpster with an enclosure are not shown; and the rear yard buffer is still shown at 10 feet mstead of 15 as required but they could seek a variance for that. Mr. Shartman stated that the dumpster and unloading zone is already on the property in the back. Mr. Conway wanted those shown on the plan, since it is not known if they would be in the same location. Mr. Shartman responded that they would remain where they are, since the trucks can get to them there and questioned why they would have to be enclosed because there was a mound and a fence shielding it. It was agreed that it would not need to be screened, if more landscaping were added. Mr. Shartman agreed to additional landscaping. The plantings must be approved by the architectural review board. The developers have been discussing the retention with Assistant City Engineer McDermott, and City Engineer Deichmann advised that it can be worked out, but he had not discussed it with Mr. McDermott. The members discussed the proposal with the developers. Mr. Tallon explained to the audience that Mr. Shartman drew the dumpster and loading zone location on the plans since they were not shown; he agreed to increase the landscaping on the west and north to screen the property; he increased the rear buffer to 15 feet, and the building in the rear has been eliminated. Mr. Gabriel, a resident, stated that there are two dunnpsters, and asked if anyone had determined if the ditch could handle the water. Mr. Burke responded that the plans for the detention had been submitted, and as required by the city, the run off will not be increased from what it is now. As far as he knows Mr.