Laserfiche WebLink
<br />come back to the next meeting. Mr. Abbott was concerned about a deed restriction, since other deed <br />restrictions pertaining to recreation areas had been over turned by the courts. He wondered if this could <br />be the same. Mr. Tallon stated that, if this happened, the deed restrictions were not written properly; <br />since the deed restriction must ru.n with the land. Mr. Bishilany, a resident, questioned the drainage, <br />since they have serious flooding problems. Mr. Tallon explained that any development that went in <br />would have to retain its own water, and the new ord.uiance requires ftt they retain more water than <br />was required before. Mr. McDermott explained tliat this was only preluniuary, but this would be <br />discussed with the subdivision proposal at a planning commission meeting and he would be notified. <br />R. Tallon moved to table the Vienna Woods Lot Split proposal to subdivide perma.uent parcel No. 231- <br />27-03 which fronts on Lorain Road, into two (2) parcels. Proposed Sublot `B", which will remain <br />fronting on Lorain Road, is split-zoned: mostly Retail, Business, General, but having a"C" Residence, <br />Single, strip at the north (rear) portion. Proposed Sublot "A" is zoned "C" Residence, Single Entirely. <br />Both proposed sublots conform to zoning code requirements for area and frontage. This proposal will <br />be tabled until the next meeting so a deed restriction for the rear portion of parcel `B" which is zoned <br />residential can be submitted to the Law Department, for their opinion. The developer is further asked to <br />submit a revised plan showing how he tried to re-configure parcel "A" to include all the residential land <br />incorporated as buildable. The motion was seconded by A. Mauuiug, and unanimously approved. <br />3) Dasgupta Consolidation and Assembly Plat. <br />The proposal is to combine permanent parcel nos. 235-13,045 and 235-13-046, located on the west <br />side of Bums Road, north of Midvale Avenue, into one (1) parcel. Zoning is `B" Residence, single, <br />entirely and the proposal conforms to zoning code requirements for area and frontage. <br />Mr. Benns, builder, explained this proposal has already been approved by the board of zoning appeals. <br />He clarified that sublots 45 and 46 are both 40 foot lots. At one time, there was a house which <br />straddled the two properties. They are going to combine the two lots to form an 80 foot lot wluch will <br />be used for the construction of a new dwelling. Assistant City Engiueer McDermott explained, due to <br />conflicting data, it was originally assumed these properties had been combined, however, through <br />further investigation, it was discovered they had not yet consolidated the lots. It was clarified that, at <br />this time, both lots are vacant. <br />Chairman Tallon moved to approve Dasgupta's proposal to combine perinaneut parcel nos. 235-13-045 <br />- and 235-13-046, located on the west side of Burns Road, north of Midvale Aveuue, into one (1) parcel. <br />Zoning is `B" Residence, single, entirely and the proposal conforms to zoning code requirements for <br />area and frontage. The motion was seconded by K. O'Rourke and unanunously approved. <br />4) Hammerschmidt Builders, Ann F. Christman, and Joseph Bouman Lot Split and Assembly Plat. <br />(Note: Relates to Beaumont Place Preliminary Plans, approved by planning commission 5/28/96). <br />The proposal is to assemble (combine) the south portion of penuanent parcel no. 231-26-89, currently <br />landlocked, with permauent parcel no. 231-26-18 as requested by planning commission as part of the <br />Beaumont Place approval. The proposal also includes a land split of peiYnanent parcel no. 231-26-088, a <br />strip of which is to be joined to originally proposed sublot 19 of Beaumont Place, which is now <br />proposed to be split into two (2) buildable lots fronting on Gessner Road; the remaining portion of <br />parcel 231-26-088 will require a variance. Zouing is `C'- Residence, Single entirely and the proposal <br />conforms to Zoning Code requirements for area and frontage. <br />4