My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission
>
10/08/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:19 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:03:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/8/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.. <br />comfort of theu guests, noting that the Man7ott Courtyard received one; a variances for limited cooking <br />facilities, which also has a precedent since Studio Plus received a variance, and considering an ordinance <br />permitting it that has been introduced in council; and also a variance for the size of 87 out of the 131 <br />units to be 317 square feet, and again there was a precedent since a variance was granted for some o- <br />the rooms in Studio Plus. Mr. Herbster asked if 64% of Studio Plus' rooms received a variance. Mr. <br />Jobeson responded that 20 units received a variance, but he did not know how many rooms they had. <br />1VIr. Rymarczyk advised that Studio Plus had 92 or 96 rooms and atso asked if the signage would <br />require a variance. Mr. Newberry advised that the signage would be revised to conform to the code and <br />they would present it to the architectural review board. Mr. Tallon asked Mr. Jobeson to clarify his <br />statement that they try to locate where there are offices, and asked if they built in au area where there <br />are not a conglomeration of office buildings, did they attract offices. Mr. Jobeson repeated.that they do <br />locate where there are offices, and there are some other pluses such as, being close airports, convention <br />facilities, or hospitals, but he stated that if an office developer can point to amenities that can serve <br />office buildings such as hotels and restaurants, it will be easier to develop an office park. Mr. Manuing <br />noted that one of the handouts stated that the probability of locating in North Olmsted was medium to <br />high, it was medium to locate iu Beachwood, but in Independence it was low. Mr. Jobeson responded <br />that tlus mainly referred to where they were in the tune line, whether they had a site under contract, and <br />where they are in the process of pursuing the developmeut. He stated that they were fiuthest along here <br />thau in other Cleveland areas. He maintaiued that it was low in Independence because they did not have <br />a site under contract. Mr. Mauuuig asked if their research looked mainly at office when determiuing a <br />site. Mr. Jobeson stated that a lot would be office, but they look at the other things as well, airports, <br />convention facilities, and hospitals. Mr. Mauuing asked if North Olmsted was picked because it looked <br />like a good potential for an office base. Mr..Jobeson responded that North Olmsted was picked because <br />it was a clean upscale commuuity with premium land values, and its proximity to the airport is <br />iunportant. He noted that the west side of inetro Cleveland, is more spread out and there is not a bi; <br />mass of office space, like there is in Independence and on Chagrin Boulevard and I271, but he believect <br />that the west side was a strong and viable market, aud he thought that there was a potential for more <br />office developmeut. Mr. Tallou noted that they show 317 square feet, 14 foot and a half inch by 22 foot, <br />10 inches in the brochure, but when he scaled the plans it came to 13 by 21 foot. Mr. Jobesou <br />responded that the plans were not to scale. Mr. Tallon advised that plans submitted to the commission <br />were supposed to be to scale, and since that these rooms are 293 square feet, not 317 square feet, tlus <br />drawing is not correct. He had asked for correct drawings at the last meeting and this is the same <br />drawing. Mr. Jobeson stated that the size of the units would match the size stated in the brochure. Mr. <br />Tallon wondered how the commission could know that the building fits on the site. Mr. Jobeson stated <br />that the rooms are hard to measure ou the plans. According to wliat they say in one layout, the standard <br />rooms would only have to be increased by. 3 feet, so with 6, rooms across they would only have to <br />lengthen the building by 18 feet and since there are 4 rooms deep, they would only have to widen the <br />building by 12 feet, and no variances would be required. If the rooms sizes in the brochure are correct it <br />would only be about 9 feet by 15 feet wluch would be miuiinal. Mr. Jobeson responded that, from their <br />experience in the market place, they would prefer to keep the room size as outlined in the brochure and <br />did not think the top mauagement would agree to 345 square feet, so he is requesting to keep them as <br />submitted. He stated that no standard room in the chain is bigger than 317 square feet. He estimated <br />that the room rates are based on the rates of Hampton Inn which is about $69.00 -$79.00, the <br />Marriott Courtyard which is about $89.00 to $99.00, and the Residence Inn which is about $109 in the <br />Cleveland market and their rates are probably closer to the Courtyard. He further advised that the rate <br />would go up about $10.00 higher in each category. The members studied the rear elevation on thi <br />original plans. The buildings are usually dark and light tan stucco, but they, will have to satisfy the city' <br />architectural review board and the owner of the property. Mr. Tallon advised that they have fouud <br />Dryvit to be unsatisfactory especially on the lower portion of the building. The members agreed that <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.