My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/1996 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1996
>
1996 Architectural Review Board
>
07/17/1996 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:22 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:10:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1996
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/17/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Conway clarified that they technically could start construction of the building before the signs are <br />approved, but the sigus must be approved prior to installation. <br />III. SIGNS: (continued at tlus point). <br />2) Red Wing Shoes, (Oluo Awning Mfg. Co). Proposal to install awning with signage (existing sign is <br />to be replaced) . Note: Awniing is NOT Illuininated. <br />No represeutative present thus Building Commissioner Conway explained Red Wing Shoes would <br />like to constiuct a red avvning which must also go before board of zoning appeals for size and <br />dimension. It was clarified Red Wing Shoes is located in Columbia Plaza and currently there is a <br />browu mansard roof. Mr. Liggett noted that there are ouly two major tenants in that building and if <br />an awming is installed on 18 or 20 feet over one uuit in the building it will stand out. Mr. Yager <br />explained that the signs in tlus plaza do not coordinate and by installing tlus awviug they are <br />worsening the conditions by protruding and not coordinating. Mr. Liggett stated if tlus board would <br />even consider tlus proposal they would need to bring in a scheme towards the whole facade <br />addressuig the awning aud completing the building. <br />Mr. Yager motioned to reject the awning outright and requested a coord'uiated sigu package be <br />presented 'ui the future. Tlie motiou was seconded by S. ICrieger and uuanimously approved. <br />VI. ADJOLJRNMENT: <br />The tneeting was adjourned at 6:35 P.M. <br />? <br />B. <br />A. Conush, Assistant Clerk of Commissions. <br />I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.