Laserfiche WebLink
.-, <br />recommendations. Mr. Yager believed that tlus proposal is unacceptable and preferred to reject it as <br />presented. Mr. Gallagher thought it should be continued so that the board can review a colored <br />rendering. Mr. Wagner stated that a colored rendering was provided at the planving commission <br />meeting. Mr. Yager asked if the eggcrate lining will be eliminated. Mr. Wagner noted he prefers the <br />eggcrate lining so that the ahiminum framing is not visible. Mr. Yager reiterated the style should be <br />modified so that it is more consistent with the Tony Roma's awuiug. Nlr. Wagner explained plauuing <br />commission did not want the aluminum framing to be visible. Mr. Conway suggested removing the <br />avvning adjacent to the Tony Roma's awuing. Mr. Gallagher would like to see a colored rendering of <br />the facade and preferred to defer the proposal until the next meeting. Mr. Conway did.not believe this <br />drawiug would be of much assistance, as these are totally different awniugs. W. Yager believed W. <br />Wagner has the option to defer the proposal or request a vote. He cautioned, if a vote is requested, the <br />proposal would most likely be rejected for the following reasons: the canopy is u.ncoordinated with the <br />neighboring Tony Roma's; the paint scheme and trim colors should be consistent; and the basic color of <br />the facade is not acceptable. He noted that the awning does not have to match Tony Roma's exactly, <br />but should be similar. He elaborated that Tony.Roma's paints the bases of the pilasters and has a green <br />cornice, wheras Chuck E Cheese has painted nuts that are distinctly different. Mr. Yager suggested <br />bringing this back with some type of intent to solve this problem. In response to Mr. Gallagher's <br />question, Mr. Yager stated he would like to have the goofy logo removed. Mr. Liggett added that this <br />is similar to the Murray's logo and to keep consistent it should be rejected. Mr. Wagner noted a permit <br />has already been issued on the logo. Mr. Conway added there is an existing logo which will only be <br />replaced. Mr. Gallagher stated the board can still recommend no loga In response to Mr. Yager's <br />question Mr. Conway wondered if there would be any benefit to continuing the proposal. W. Wagner <br />prefers to have the proposal tabled. Mr. Conway suggested making a motion to reject the proposal <br />until the boards recommendations are addressed. It was noted,'ifthe proposal is approved or rejected, <br />this it could continue to plauniug commission, but if it is tabled the proposal would come back to <br />architectural review board before going to planuing commission. If Mr. Wagner prefers a vote, he has <br />the option to take the architectural review board's approval or rejection to planning commission. Mr. <br />Liggett would rather have the proposal tabled so that he has the oppurtunity to review the revisions. It <br />was clarified that the neact meeting will be November 20, 1996. Mr. Wagner requested that the proposal <br />be tabled. <br />S. Krieger moved to table the proposal until the next meeting. The motion was seconded <br />by T. Liggett and unanimously approved. Motion carried. <br />2) Mongello & Associates, Inc. Office Building, 25128 Lorain Road (former fire station). <br />Proposal to remodel existing build.ing for office/retail use. <br />Mrs. Kopko and Mr. Mongello presented the proposal. The location is on the site of the old fire <br />station. The first item addressed was the site, Mr. Mongello explained that planning commission <br />recommended the curved drive in the front, as there was originally parking in that location. All <br />variances were granted for this site. Mr. Yager clarified the plan shows a stone drive around the <br />building, the old fire station will be remodeled, and an addition added. Mr. Mongello explained the <br />addition will be for the location of his corporate office and hopefully a medical facility will be in the <br />front. Ms. Kopko elaborated currently they are in negotiations with MRI and physical therapy. Mr. <br />Mongello clarified that all rental space will be for office or business use. He acknowledged, currently he <br />does not know what will be in that rental area. Mr. Yager noted there is a stone drive between the <br />property involved and the neighboring strip center. He asked if it would be possible to eliminate that <br />portion of the stone drive and one of the curb cuts. Mr. Mongello believed two curb cuts are necessary <br />;