01/31/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

breezeway, there would only be 6 feet between it and the existing garage. The members agreed it would be best to have the breezeway. Building Commissioner Conway advised that the variance was far the existing garage because, once it is attached to the house; 15 feet total side yards are requ.ired. The members had no problem with the request. M. Boyle moved to grant to Joe Arnold, 24227 Elm Road, the request for a 2 foot side yard variance and a 4.7 total side yard variance to construct family room addition with breezeway attaching existing detached garage to dwelling (existing detached garage is 3 foot off property line). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.07(a). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 4. J. E Bucsanvi, 25179 Gessner Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 3 foot side setback variance for shed (akeady installed). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02. Heard at begiuning of ineeting. 5. Timothy Parker, 6125 Stearns Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 313 square foot variance to construct attached garage and keep existing detached garage for workshop (conforming additions are being constructed). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)(3). Note: access drive not shown on plan but is required and must be paved. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Parker and Mr. McGinty, neighbor. Mr. Parker explained that the detached garage is existing, but they are constructing an addition and an attached garage. He would like to keep the existing detached garage for a work shop and to store a boat. He explained that he is adding to both sides of the house and roughly half of the one side will be garage area. Mr. McCriuty just wanted to know what was being done and questioned if Stearns Road were zoned commercial. It was clarified that Stearns Road was zoned residential and this will be for the owner's personal use. Mr. Parker stated that there was a drive now but he would have to relocate part of it, but he did intend to pave it. Neither the members or Mr. McGinty had a problem with the proposal. J. Maloney moved to grant the request of Timothy Parker, 6125 Stearns Road, for a 313 square foot variance to construct attached garage and keep existing detached garage for workshop. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)(3). The applicant is. knowledgeable that access drive must be paved to meet the city requ.irements. The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall, and unauimously approved. Variance granted. 6. Premier Bank (Rivi/Rego)4700 Great Northem Blvd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 72 square foot variance for excess business unit signage to advertise bank in supermarket. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12(a). Chairiuau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was admuustered to Mr. Rusitinsky, sign contractor. It was clarified that no one was present from the bank. Mr. Gomersall -believed that the sign was much too big. Mr: Purper noted that the board had made Rivi/Rego reduce their sign, and now there will be one. He wondered if the deal with the bank was made when they came before the board originally, but .there was no.one present from Rini/Rego. Mr. Gomersall agreed that when they approved the sign, they believed it would be the only one. Building Commissioner Conway advised that they are also putting in a Cinnabunn facility in the store, and he is concerned that they, too, might want a sign. He noted that Rini's asked for a variance on the basis that the front of the store was some distance from the road. Mr. Purper stated that if this were granted, Rini/Rego would get just 3