12/11/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? the variance for average width of lot as, if it were denied, the lot may no longer be buildable. He noted there is a provision in the zoning code that provides that it is permissible to build on a non- conforming lot, and explained that you cannot have a variance for an existing lot. Mr. Gomersall reiterated that he did not understand the first note. It was noted the only variance needed is for the side yard, and the note is meant to clarify that point. Mr. Gareau restated, there is a provision in the zoning code which states that if a lot is non-conforming, but all other requirements. are met, variances are not required. Mr. Gomersall clarified only one variance is required. A resident wondered if the proposed new dwelling will be four foot off the property line. Mr. Purper clarified that code requires a minimuni of 15 feet of total side yards: Mr. Fox's proposal includes 11 feet of total side yards, which is his reason for seeking a 4 foot variance. Another resident questioned if there is a requirement for width of lots iu class A and B on Barton Road. Much of the discussiou was inaudible as several people were talkiug at the same time. Mr. Gareau clarified that tlus is a buildable lot. W. Maloney stated the proposal is 150 feet back from the street which is permissible by code. Mr. Gareau explained the last time the zoning code changed the setback requirement was changed, as at one time a variance would have been required if a home were more than 75 feet back from the street. Mr. Campbell wondered what the use is for a building code as nothing conforms to it. Ms. Boyle responded that this proposal complies with building code. Mr. Campbell believed the proposal encroaches on his property on the north and Mr. Schmelter's properly on the south. Mr. Gomersall explained these variances are very minor, as he could build between the two neighboring residents and still conform to all provisions in the zoning code. He believed, by going 80 feet behind the neighboring properties, it is less bothersome than building the home in line with the others. A neighbor_ stated that he would like to build on the south side of his house and would like to know how close he can come to maintain the 15 foot aggregate, if there is already 20 feet on the opposite side. It was explained, any given resident can build 5 feet. off the property line, but one must maintain 15 feet of total side yards, or a variance would be required. Mr. Fox's reasoning for moving'the house back was to make the neighbors less cramped in, as he could conceivably build in line with the iest of the homes and conform to all the provisions of the zoning code. Mr. Purper suggested that the board vote on this proposal. J. Maloney moved to grant the proposal of Chris Fox, sublot 1 Barton Road, North of 6115 Barton Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request the following variances: A 4 foot variance for width of total side yards. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section's 1135.07 (a). The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall and unanimously approved. Variance granted. . ' In the framing of the motion, Law Director Gareau clarified the 10.865 foot variance for average width of lot is not required, as this is a buildable lot. 5. Timberview Homes, 29275 Hastings Dr• Request for variance (1123.12). Request a special permit to have a temporary construction trailer in a residential district until the house being constiucted at the same address is completed. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1123.06 (a). No representative was present. The proposal will be continued until next meeting. 6. Tonv's Auto Etc., 26674 Lorain Road Request the following signage variances: . A 2.5 foot variances for excessive free stand.ing signage. A variance for two names to appear, on pylon sign. A variance to install a pole sign (prohibited by code) 5