12/11/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r" V the trash containers are and relocate the trash containers. The trash containers have been moved ui between the two buildings, this plan shows what was proposed previously, when an add'ation was proposed between the two building. Mr. Schultz does not believe that this will ever be built. Other locations were suggested and Mr. Schultz noted that the parking and retention was already installed in those areas and he doubted that he could build there because they could not put in footers. He listed what lawn equipment that they were storing. Mr. C'rabriel doubted that they needed this for lawn equipment and was concerned that there was a hidden agenda and he also questioned why a garage door was need.. Mr. Schultz responded that they had to store about 50 chairs that they needed for meetings and that they needed the garage door to get a truck iu and out. He clarified that there would be no sewers in this building. Mr. Gabriel again stated that this was a big building just to store lawn equipinent and he again mentioned the fumes. Mr. Schultz pointed out where the vents were and suggested that this building might block the fumes from going toward his property. Mr. Purper suggested raising the vents so the fumes would not go out on the property. Mr. Gomersall again suggested cutting the building down to 30 by 25 feet and keeping it away from the residents. The existing building is grandfathered in, but Mr. Gareau, pointed out that if this were built the neighbors would have 20 feet more wall to look at. Mr. Gomersall stated that if they move it over they would still have the doors and they would not need a variance. Mr. Schultz believed that the owner would agree to that. Mr. Gomersaff stated that the board would vote on this request. R. Cpomersall moved to grant the request of Great Northern Dodge, 26100 I,orain Road, a 20 foot side yard variance for building abutting a residential zone. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1139.07. At this point Mr. Gareau suggested that the developer just withdraw the request. Mr. Schultz agreed to withdraw. Request withdrawn. 4. Chris Fox, sublot 1 Barton Road, North of 6115 Barton Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request the following variances: (1) A 10.865 foot variance for average width of lot. (2) A 4 foot variance for width of total side yards. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section's 1165.04 (o-2) and 1135.07 (a). Note: (1) This variance is required because, all other regulations of this zoning code (specifically side yard), were not complied with. (2) The square footage of house was determined by scaling the site plan, no building plans were submitted. Additional variances may be required with the submission of building plans, if minimum floor area requirements are not met. Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Fox, Mr. & Mrs. Mericle, Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Foraker. Mr. Gomersall stated there was an attempt to do things backwards, as a request was made at a previous meeting for variances to build a shed prior to the construction of the hmme. He wondered if Mr. Fox has any building plans. Mr. Fox noted he offered building plans, but was told they need not be submitted with the variance request. Mr. Gomersall wondered what is the meaning o? "This variance is required because, all other regulations of this zoning code (specifically side yard), were not complied with." Law D'uector Crareau did not believe a 10.865 foot variance for average width of lot would be required, as this is an existing lot. He elaborated, just because the lot is non-conforming does not mean it is not a buildable lot. Mr. (iareau did not believe you can get a variance for a width of the lot because the lot is existing. Assistant Building Commissioner Ryflnarczyk explained the width of the lot is 59.47 feet, and the zoning code requires a 70 foot lot. Mr. Gareau disagreed about the necessity of .;1 4