04/17/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sections 1163.11(a); 1163.12(a); and 1163.12(h). The motion was seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 12. Leo Martynowski, 29692 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to install three individual tenant signs in place of one existing sign on an existing non-conforming pole sign. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12(h). Note: Pole sign is to be r.emoved by January 1, 1998. Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to J. MartSmowski, representing his father, and neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Anders. It was clarified for Mrs. Anders that there were not to be three separate signs, but.that three tenant signs would be placed within the existing sign cabinet. She was shown a rendering of the sign. Mr. Anders objected because of the lights from these signs and the street. Ms. Boyle explained that the pole sign would have to be changed to a ground sign in two years and would eliminate some of the light. W. Purper moved to grant a request to Leo Martynowski, 29692 Lorain Road, for a variance to install three individual tenant signs in place of one existing sign on an existing non-conforming pole sign with the condition that the pole sign is to be removed by January 1, 1998 Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12(h). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney, and u.nauunously approved. Variance granted. 13. G. & D. Wilburn. 4553 Porter Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to have a pet care 'service in residential district. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(b). Chairmau Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mrs. Wilburn, and neighbors, Mrs. Hartzel, and Mr. Arif and his mother. Ms. Wilburn explained that she intended to build an addition onto the garage, to house the dogs. They will board dogs which will be dropped off and picked up during one hour in the morning and one hour in the evening, so there would not be a lot of traffic. The dogs would be exercised in the back yard. One small sign with only her name would be on the mailbox. Mr. Gomersall advised that there were letters from three neighbors who were opposed to having a business in a residential neighborhood. The members agreed. Mrs. Wilburn did not know that anyone, had objected. The neighbors discussed the proposal with Mrs. Wilburn. Mr. Gomersall also noted that the traffic at that point was very heavy. R. Gomersall moved to grant the variance for G. & D. Wilburn, 4553 Porter Road; for a variance to have a pet care service in residential district: Violation 'of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(b). The __mqtion was seconded by J. Maloney. Roll call on motion: Gomersall, Maloney, Boyle, Koberna, and -- Purper, no. Motion failed to pass. Variance denied. 14. D. & D. Comodeca, 3394 W. 231st Request for variauce (1123.12). Request 2 foot side yard variance and 7 foot rear yard-variance to construct a detached garage (existing garage will be removed). Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)(2). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Engelke, contractor. Building Commissioner Conway explained that the homeowner had advised that the garage will be installed within the next 12 montlis, but in case it is not installed by summer, he would prefer that it be incorporated in the variance. Mr. Engelke advised that the addition would be built as soon as possible and his company would be extending the drive and pouring the foundatiou, but the homeowner would be installing the garage. M. Boyle moved to grant the request for D. & D. 7