10/02/1996 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-doingliusuiess`w%itliout inoney: Mr. Conway`?acknowledged No" Mor.e *Sigus would-'have to" be a registered contractor to complete a job in the city. Mr. Gomersall stated this sigu is au example of what the city is trying to prevent, as it is non-conforming. Mr. Hansen eaplained when Mr. . .'O'ConueIl, zlie:sign inspector, inforfnEd him that:he-would need a permit?•a?id:approv?al;?he? contacted- No More Sigus and they agreed to amend the situatiou: He noted No More Sigus did not keep that promise therefore Next I3ay Signs was contracted to complete the job. Mr. Hansen maintained he would like to keep the existing sign until 1998, when all the other non-conformiug sigus coine down. Mr. Gomersall noted althougli he likes to see businesses flourish in the city, there are guidelines tlus board needs to follow. He stated he would like them to get together with the other two tenants now, so that an agreement can be reached before January 1, 1998. Mr. Kobema eaplained the sign was not made to hold the one on the top. He believed it was a safety hazard, as the sign could blow down aud hurt someoue. The members agreed to continue tlus proposal until December, in order to give Mr. Hansen time to negotiate with the other two tenants. Mr. Hansen did not believe the other two tenants would be willing to negotiate, as their signs are good until 1998. The board informed him he does have negotiating power and suggested contacting the owner of the property. Mr. Hanseu believed Ruu's owned the property, but did not believe they would take lus concerns seriously. Law Director Gareau asked that Mr. Hansen have Mr. Rini contact him, as he believed this should not take any longer than two months. In response to Mr. Hansen's question, Mr. Conway responded that something can be worked out as far as square footage of the signs, and reiterated that N1r. Hansen should contact the owner of the property. Mr. Gomersall stated that Mr. Hansen may have the option of continuing tlus proposal until the December 4 meeting or asking for a vote on it now. Mr. Hausen agreed to continue tlus proposal until December. Chairman Gomersall moved to continue the proposal of Custom Tint (Harmon Glass) 25770 Lorain- Road, uutil Wednesday, Deceinber 4, 1996. The motiou was seconded by W. Purper and unavimously approved. During the framing of the motion, it was clarified that the proposal will again be heard on December 4, 1996. Ruu Rego Supermarket, 23100 Lorain Road. Request for variance (1123.12). Request variances for the following: An 111 square foot variance for wall sign in excess of allowable signage for a business unit. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.12 (A). A 6 inch variance for wall sign in excess of allowable vertical dimension Violation ofOrd. 90-125, Section 1163.12 (A). A variance to re-face the existing prolubited pole sign. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.19 (A). No representative was present, the members decided to defer proposal until the next meeting. R. Goinersall inoved to continue the Rini Rego Supermarket proposal, located at 23100 Lorain Road uutil the November 7, 1996 meeting. The motiou was secouded by M. Boyle aud uuanunously approved. The members will discuss tlus proposal at the November meeting. was adiourned-at 8:45 P.M. R. Goinersall, Chau-man A. Assistant Clerk of Commissions 6