Laserfiche WebLink
<br />that option, and he is not aware that tlus is still available. In response to a question, Mr. Conway stated <br />he could send a violation letter stating Mr. Blazey has five (5) days to vacate the property. If Mr. <br />Blazey ignores the letter, Mr. Conway has no authoi7ty other than to come back to couucil. Council <br />will not meet until September, therefore Mr. Blazey would have more thau a month. He explained that <br />the city has legal procedures to go through prior to evictiou. Mr. Conway clarified, the whole purpose <br />for requesting tlus emergency meeting is that the other way it would take sixty (60) to ninety (90) days <br />before he could take action. Nfr. Conway further explained, if Mr. Blazey receives the five (5) day <br />notice and does not comply, he would perfonn a title search which will cost Mr. Blazey approxunately <br />four hundred dollars ($400). It was clarified, if the notification went out Friday, Mr. Conway will allow <br />approximately twelve (12) days before he will request a title search. It was stated the board may graut <br />an extension of time, however, Mr. Conway is requesting that a deadline be set up. Mr. Engoglia <br />stated, he would be willing to grant au additional two weeks and wondered if tlus would be enough <br />time. Mr. Conway clarified if the board grants an additional two weeks, with the five day notice going <br />out at the end ofthat period, would grant Mr. Blazey almost three (3) weeks. The board reiterated, that <br />Mr. Blazey will not have to be out at the end of that period, however, Mr. Couway will start the <br />necessaiy procedures. The board does not want to see Mr. Blazey get hurt. Mr. Blazey stated he does <br />not want to retain ownerslup of the property, because taxes will be incredible. Mr. Engoglia explained <br />that tlus board is in favor of granting an exteusion and the church is trying to help, but he would like <br />some assurauce fiom N1r. Blazey that he will allow tlus assistauce. He fiuther suggested, if N1r. Blazey <br />is in fact going to sell the property, he ask lus lawyer to contact a local real estate man for an evaluatiou, <br />so that he may receive the best value for lus property. Mr. Blazey agreed to allow Mr. Conway to <br />coutact lus attoniey. The board agreed to a two week extension. P. Engoglia made a motiou to declare Mr. Blazey's Home, located at 4724 Canterbury Road, a public <br />uuisance and in need of summary judgmeut. He clarified that the board will give Mr. Blazey two (2) <br />weeks time, before the building commissioner takes appropriate action. In the framiug of the inotion, it <br />was clarified that the five (5) day notification letter may be sent out two weeks froin July 3 l, 1996. Mr. <br />Conway explained, with the boards approval, the house will be declared a public nuisance or deemed <br />uusafe, and secondly tlus is an emergeucy situation in need of a summary abatemeut, wluch means <br />forthwith. Mr. Kazak advised Ndr. Blazey to keep in contact just in case something different occurs, <br />such as sale of the property. It was reiterated tlus board is allowing two (2) weeks, before any type of <br />notification is mailed. In response to Mr. Engoglia's question, 1VIi. Blazey shook lus head, in <br />agreement, that he in fact understood the motion. The motiou was seconded by D. Spoerke and <br />unanimously approved. <br />V. NEW BUSINESS: <br />No items. <br />VI. OLD BUSINESS: <br />No items. <br />VII. ADJOURN-MENT: <br />T'he meeting was adjourned at 8:45 P.M. <br />1• ?' ,, <br />R. Burk, Chairmau A. Cornish, Assistaut Clerk of Commissions <br />4