01/14/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?:. south side of Barton Road between the westerly corporation line and=Bradley Road. Zoning for Parcel `A' is mostly multiple Residence with approxiinately the front 200 feet of the parcel zoned `B' Single- Family Residence. Zoning for parcel `B' is `B' Single-Family Residence for the front half and multiple residence of the rear half. Both proposed sublots conform to `B' Single-Family Residence requirements for fi ontage and area. Irene Ham, Realtor presented the proposal. Also in attendance were M'r. and Mrs. Steve, the property owners. Mrs. Ham eacplained parce1233-07-06, will be split off approximately 250 feet back from Barton Road. The northern portion this proposed lot split will be adjoined to parce1233-07-10 to form the proposed parcel `B'. The remaining southernmost portion of 233-07-06 is to be combine.d with the abutting parce1233-07-09, thereby creating the proposed parcel `A'. Mr. Brennan questioned what the zoning is on parce1233-07-09. Mrs. Ham noted the zonage lines are shown on the plat and tlus is a split zoued lot. She explained the northernmost is single family; the middle multi family; and the southernmost Limited Industry - Industrial Park. The members noted the proposal comes around the Taliffproperty. The Steves' plan on selling the parcel with the existing house. Mrs. Ham did not believe the Steves' plan on selling parce1233-07-09 at this point. It was noted there is no home on parce1233-07-09, which abuts Barton Woods Condominiums. The meinbers discussed the proposal among themselves. Mr. Tallon asked if there is ten feet from the garage to the property line, as this is a zoning requirement: Mrs. Ham was unsure if there is ten feet, and the Steves' agreed to move the line to insure there is ten feet between the garage and.the proposed split. The members had no further questions. Mr. Tallou asked if any members from the audience had questions. Mr. Palos, who lives across the street from the property involved, wondered if the single family residents zoning can be changed to multi-family. Mr. Tallon clarified auyone can ask for rezoning, but that does not mean it will get approval from the city. He noted that there is actually three uses on the property. There were no further questions. R. Tallon motioned to approve the Steve Lot Split and Consolidation Plat. The proposal is to split permanent parcel number 233-07-06 into a smaller lot with an existing house and garage and to join the southerly or rear portion of the lot to the abutting parcel (P.P. No. 233-07-09 or Parcel `A"). The larger portion of P.P. No. 233-07-06 with the existing house and garage is to be joined with the abutting landlocked parcel (P.P. No. 233-07-10) to form Parcel `B'. Location is the south side of Barton Road between the westerly corporation line and Bradley Road. Zoning for Parcel `A' is mostly multiple Residence with approximately the front 200 feet of the parcel zoned `B' Single-Family Residence. Zoning for parcel `B' is `B' Single-Family Residence for the front half and multiple residence of the rear half. Both proposed sublots conform to `B' Single-Family Residence requirements for frontage and area. The rear lot line of parcel `B' shall be positioned so that the existing garage has the proper setback. The motion was seconded by T. Brennau aud unanimously approved. V. COMMIJNICATIONS: 1) The members discussed the fence along Burns Road, abutting the school property, and buffering the neighbors from the bus garage. Mr. Tallon explained that the last plan presented did not include the Reynolds parcel number, therefore Mr. Frick believes he is not required to install the fence on that parcel. It was noted that nobody noticed the missing parcel at the time the plan was approved. Mr. Tallon noted the intention of installing the fence was to enclose the entire area. Mr. Koeth believed that plauning commission should make the recommendation that Mr. Frick or the School Board pay the Reynolds, in good faith, the $318.00. Mr: Tallon added the full intent of the fence was to include tlus , parcel. Mr. Tallon agreed to draft a letter advising Mr. Frick and possibly the superintendent of the commission's recommendation. Mr. Herbster added, a copy of this letter should also be forwarded to the school board. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk was unsure a permit was issued for tlus